Murphy v. State

Decision Date05 December 1932
Docket Number30144
Citation164 Miss. 296,144 So. 699
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesMURPHY v. STATE

Division B

1. CRIMINAL LAW.

Judgment of conviction of possessing liquor in violation of state law held not invalid because mayor entered it on mayor's docket instead of separate justice of peace docket (Code 1930, section 2535).

2. CRIMINAL LAW.

Court judicially knows that justices of peace are not required to have seals or to authenticate their acts under seal.

3. JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.

Ex officio justices of peace need not have seals or authenticate their acts under seal.

4. CRIMINAL LAW. On appeal to circuit court from judgment in prosecution before mayor, mayor's testimony that docket caption shown in transcript was wrong held harmless because unnecessary.

Although transcript, as certified to circuit court by mayor as ex officio justice of the peace, showed that prosecution was in name and in behalf of state, for violation of state statute and not on account of municipal ordinance, case on docket was styled Town of C. v. G. M., and mayor was permitted to testify that docket caption should have been State v. G. M but such testimony was harmless because it could have been stricken from record, and to transcript would still have stood as valid.

HON. D M. ANDERSON, Judge.

APPEAL from circuit court of Leake county, HON. D M. ANDERSON, Judge.

Gustave Murphy was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Affirmed.

O. H. Barnett, Jr., of Carthage, for appellant.

The affidavit, warrant for arrest of defendant, transcript of record, nor any other papers in the record of this case tried in the justice of the peace court did not bear the seal of the court, neither did any of them contain a certificate showing why no seal was attached if it had one, or that it had no seal. The seal of office is required by law and the authentication of documents from such offices must be under seal.

Dennis v. Town of Walnut Grove, 128 So. 556; McAllum et al. v. Spinks et al., 91 So. 694; Burton v. Cramer, 86 So. 578.

Variance in affidavit and transcript of the record will be seen from the record in this case.

It is impossible to tell from the record whether this was a case in the name of the State of Mississippi or in the name of the Town of Carthage. That is a material variance between the transcript of the record and the affidavit and warrant for the arrest of the appellant; these should be identical.

The circuit court committed error in allowing oral testimony to be taken to correct the transcript of record.

Washington v. State, 93 Miss. 275.

No judgment was ever entered in the ex-officio justice of the peace court.

Section 2535, Code of 1930; Forrest County v. Steele, 124 Miss. 340.

The justice of peace court is a court of record and the evidence of its judgments must be found upon the office docket if the docket is in existence, and a memorandum of copy of any intended judgment is not a judgment at least as long as the official docket can be produced.

Section 2535, Code of 1930.

Herbert Nunnery, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

OPINION

Griffith, J.

Appellant was charged by an affidavit, made before the mayor and ex-officio a justice of the peace of and within the town of Carthage, with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor "contrary to the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Mississippi." A warrant for the arrest of appellant was issued by the mayor as ex-officio justice of the peace; the warrant being addressed "to any lawful officer of Leake County." Appellant was arrested and was tried before the ex-officio justice of the peace and a jury, was convicted, and was sentenced; from which judgment he appealed to the circuit court, and on a trial de novo therein was again convicted.

Several points have been made by appellant, and, because error was confessed by the Attorney-General in his brief, we assume that it is our duty to discuss the more important of these points, at least briefly; but we reach them in our order rather than in the order of the assignment of errors.

First. It is contended that no valid judgment was entered by the ex-officio justice of the peace. This point is based on the fact that the mayor kept no separate docket as ex-officio justice of the peace, but used only one docket for the cases heard by him as mayor and those heard as an ex-officio justice of the peace. Appellant insists that, because section 2535, Code 1930, requires a police justice to keep a separate docket as justice of the peace, then the entry by an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Creel v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1938
    ... ... prosecution ... Keyes ... v. State, 155 Miss. 574, 124 So. 789; McKinney v ... State, 146 So. 458 ... Neither ... a justice of the peace nor an ex-officio justice of the peace ... is required by law to use a seal to authenticate his acts ... Murphy ... v. State, 164 Miss. 296, 144 So. 699 ... The ... allegation "residence of Joe Creel in 2nd district of ... Lake County, Miss." was a sufficient designation. All of ... the balance may be treated as surplusage ... Bradley v. State, 134 Miss. 20, 98 So. 458; ... ...
  • Bearden v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 5, 1995
    ...justice court judges and clerks are not required to place a seal upon affidavits. Miss.Code Ann. § 25-33-17 (1972); Murphy v. State, 164 Miss. 296, 144 So. 699, 700 (1932); Matthews v. State, 134 Miss. 807, 100 So. 18, 19 The claim that the State offered no proof of venue is belied by the r......
  • Wright v. Shaw
    • United States
    • Delaware Superior Court
    • February 20, 1963
    ...Parker v. Gilreath, 29 N.C. 400 (Sup.Ct.1847); Matthews v. State, 134 Miss. 807, 100 So. 18, (Sup.Ct., 1924) and Murphy v. State, 164 Miss. 296, 144 So. 699 (Sup.Ct., 1932), all are to the effect that where the law does not require Justices of the Peace to have seals, absence of a seal on o......
  • Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1932
    ... ... BANKS AND BANKING ... Statute ... authorizing national bank to act as guardian makes national ... bank so acting subject to state laws (12 U.S.C. A., section ... 248 (k)) ... 2 ... BANKS AND BANKING ... National ... bank acting as guardian treating ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT