Murphy v. State, A97A1690
Decision Date | 28 January 1998 |
Docket Number | No. A97A1690,A97A1690 |
Citation | 230 Ga.App. 365,496 S.E.2d 512 |
Parties | , 98 FCDR 603 MURPHY v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Garland, Samuel & Loeb, Donald F. Samuel, Atlanta, for appellant.
Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Erman J. Tanjuatco, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Defendant Murphy filed this appeal after his conviction for trafficking in cocaine. Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress cocaine which drug enforcement agents seized from his pants during a warrantless search at Atlanta International Airport. We reverse because defendant's consent to this search was coerced and the search was not supported by probable cause. Darby v. State, 216 Ga.App. 781, 783(2), 455 S.E.2d 850.
The trial court's order denying defendant's motion to suppress includes the following findings of fact: "The testimony at the [motion to suppress] hearing included that of [Special Agent] Roderick Jordan of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. Agent Jordan is a member of the Drug Enforcement Task Force stationed at the Atlanta Airport. Agent Jordan testified that he has 22 years of experience in narcotics, including seven years stationed at the airport. Agent Jordan's training includ[es] six months on-the-job training with Agent Paul Markonni and several training schools. Agent Jordan stated that he had interviewed hundreds or thousands of people in regards to drugs and had found concealed drugs.
Held:
1. The articulable suspicion which will authorize an airport stop under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, has been defined as whether under the totality of the circumstances the law enforcement officer has Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320(2), 443 S.E.2d 474. Evidence in the case sub judice that defendant deplaned in Atlanta after an 11-hour round-trip to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hanson, A99A2256.
...presence of certain characteristics may justify reasonable suspicion sufficient to support a brief investigatory detention, Murphy v. State, 230 Ga.App. 365 (1998), that detention must have a distinct ending point which is ascertainable to both the officers charged with enforcing the law an......
-
State v. Harris
...search of his car was valid. See Raney v. State, 186 Ga.App. 758, 760, 368 S.E.2d 528 (1988). Harris' reliance on Murphy v. State, 230 Ga.App. 365, 496 S.E.2d 512 (1998), is misplaced. In Murphy, unlike in this case, the consent was coerced. There, the defendant refused to consent and asked......
-
Rainwater v. State
...search warrant would be obtained if consent refused, but officer did not have probable cause). 8. Compare Murphy v. State, 230 Ga.App. 365, 368(1), 496 S.E.2d 512 (1998) (reversed where officers who did not have probable cause to search defendant obtained his consent by telling him he would......
-
Cuaresma v. State
...S.E.2d 212. 15. Id. 16. See Noble, supra at 83(2), 640 S.E.2d 666. 17. See Payne, supra at 742(5), 536 S.E.2d 791; Murphy v. State, 230 Ga.App. 365, 496 S.E.2d 512 (1998). 18. Payne, supra at 742-743, 536 S.E.2d ...