Murray Adler Realty Co., Inc. v. Benerofe

Decision Date02 July 1973
Citation345 N.Y.S.2d 1023,42 A.D.2d 715
PartiesMURRAY ADLER REALTY CO., INC., Respondent, v. Alvin BENEROFE, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and LATHAM, GULOTTA, CHRIST and BRENNAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover a brokerage commission, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 22, 1972, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements, cross motion granted and complaint dismissed.

In our view, no genuine triable issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of defendant's cross motion (CPLR 3212, subd. (b)). No meeting of the minds of the parties with respect to all the essential contract terms was ever reached and hence plaintiff is not entitled to a brokerage commission (Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Co., 83 N.Y. 378, 382; Kaelin v. Warner, 27 N.Y.2d 352, 318 N.Y.S.2d 294, 267 N.E.2d 86; Matter of Altz, 274 App.Div. 894, 82 N.Y.S.2d 629, affd. 300 N.Y. 607, 90 N.E.2d 65).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Nuvest, S. A. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 2, 1981
    ...Corp. v. Nevins Warehouse & Trucking Corp., 54 A.D.2d 930, 388 N.Y.S.2d 315 (2d Dep't 1976); Murray Adler Realty Co. v. Benerofe, 42 A.D.2d 715, 345 N.Y.S.2d 1023 (2d Dep't 1973), aff'd, 34 N.Y.2d 583, 354 N.Y.S.2d 947, 310 N.E.2d 543 (1974); Lemar v. Tenber Assocs., 41 A.D.2d 907, 343 N.Y.......
  • DONALD ZUCKER COMPANY v. Prime Properties, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 17, 1975
    ...is not entitled to receive a commission for unsuccessful attempts to perform a brokerage agreement. See Murray Adler Realty Co. v. Benerofe, 42 A.D.2d 715, 345 N.Y.S.2d 1023, aff'd, 34 N.Y.2d 583, 354 N.Y.S.2d 947, 310 N.E.2d 543 (1973). Consequently, we must agree with defendants that once......
  • De Angelis v. Graham
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 25, 1983
    ...33 N.Y.2d 815, 350 N.Y.S.2d 908, 305 N.E.2d 917; cf. David Day Realty v. Farkas, 75 A.D.2d 783, 428 N.Y.S.2d 242; Adler Realty Co. v. Benerofe, 42 A.D.2d 715, 345 N.Y.S.2d 1023, affd. 34 N.Y.2d 583, 354 N.Y.S.2d 947, 310 N.E.2d 543). In this regard, we note that the absence of an enforceabl......
  • Murray Adler Realty Co.,Inc. v. Benerofe
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 1974

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT