Murray v. State, 88-1393
| Decision Date | 16 August 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-1393,88-1393 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D2090 Paul Terry MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; R. Hudson Olliff, Judge.
Barbara M Linthicum, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson and Lawrence M. Korn, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and A.E. Pooser, IV and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Paul Terry Murray has appealed from judgment and sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to attempted capital sexual battery. We affirm without discussion as to the first three of the four issues raised by Murray in his pro se initial brief.
Murray alleges as the fourth issue that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea based on the trial court's failure to comply with the terms of his plea agreement. However, Murray concedes that he did not move to withdraw the plea at the time of sentencing. The issue is therefore not cognizable on direct appeal. Duhart v. State, 548 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Gill v. State, 550 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We therefore dismiss the appeal as to this issue, without prejudice to filing in the trial court either a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 to vacate his sentence. See Gill at 73.
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Reynolds v. State
...DCA 1984). As to the length of the probationary sentence, we hold that the issue is not cognizable on direct appeal. Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Hadden v. State, 555 So.2d 430 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Duhart v. State, 548 So.2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, we dis......
-
Gainer v. State, 91-1759
...1081 (Fla.1983). However, we cannot reach this issue because Gainer did not move to withdraw his plea below. See Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30, 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (the issue of whether an appellant should have been allowed to withdraw his plea is not cognizable on direct appeal where th......
-
Keith v. State, 90-1192
...without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw plea or a motion under rule 3.850 to vacate his sentence, citing Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Gill v. State, 550 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); and Isley v. State, 565 So.2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA I concur in the dismissal ......
-
Hoskins v. State, 93-53
...with the plea agreement, this court should remand either for resentencing or to permit withdrawal of his plea. In Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the appellant sought to withdraw his plea, citing the trial court's failure to comply with the terms of his plea agreement. No......