Muze v. Mayfield
| Decision Date | 24 July 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-1985,90-1985 |
| Parties | MUZE, Appellee, v. MAYFIELD, Admr., et al.; Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Company, Appellant. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
Attorney fees are not included as "costs" of a previously dismissed action unde r Civ.R. 41(D).
Appellee, Robert W. Muze ("Muze"), filed a claim with the Bureau of Workers' Compensation, alleging that he was injured on November 15, 1976 while employed by the appellant, Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Company ("Y & O"). This claim was allowed for acute back strain.
On October 25, 1983, Muze filed a motion with the Industrial Commission ("commission") requesting that his claim be additionally allowed for degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. The commission denied Muze's motion, and, pursuant to R.C. 4123.519, Muze appealed to the Harrison County Court of Common Pleas. The appeal was dismissed by agreement of the parties without prejudice under Civ.R. 41(A).
Muze refiled his case against Y & O, which prompted Y & O to file a motion requesting the court to issue an order staying all proceedings until Muze paid Y & O's costs in the previously dismissed action. In the alternative, Y & O requested that the court dismiss the refiled action unless the costs of the previously dismissed action were paid by a date certain. Y & O submitted an affidavit alleging that its costs from the prior case were $4,844.38.
The trial court held that in order to maintain his refiled action, Muze must pay the sum of $1,190, including attorney fees, plus $17.11 court costs of the prior suit, within one hundred twenty days. When Muze failed to make the payment within the designated time, the trial court dismissed the refiled case for failure to prosecute. Upon appeal, the court of appeals reversed, holding, inter alia, that under Civ.R. 41(D), attorney fees are not "costs" of a previously dismissed action unless so specified by statute.
The cause is before this court pursuant to the allowance of a motion to certify the record.
Jerry L. Riseling, Columbus, for appellee.
Hanlon, Duff & Paleudis Co., L.P.A., and John G. Paleudis, St. Clairsville, for appellant.
The issue presented for our review is whether payment of costs of a previously dismissed action under Civ.R. 41(D) includes attorney fees. For the reasons that follow, we hold that attorney fees are not costs of a previously dismissed action.
Civ. R. 41(D) reads as follows:
"If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order."
We have previously ruled that attorney fees are not included as "costs" unless specified by statute. In State, ex rel. Franklin Cty. Commrs., v. Guilbert (1907), 77 Ohio St....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Evans Koukios, D/b/a Scientific Information Systems v. Marketing Dynamics, Inc.
... ... 153, 156; In re Election of Nov. 6, 1990 (1991), 62 ... Ohio St.3d 1, 4, 577 N.E.2d 343, 345; Muze v ... Mayfield (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 173, 573 N.E.2d 1078 ... Court ... reporters and video technicians who take ... ...
-
Howard v. Wills
...fees to which * * * [specified individuals] * * * are entitled for their services in an action * * *." Muze v. Mayfield (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 173, 174, 573 N.E.2d 1078, 1079, citing State ex rel. Franklin Cty. Commrs. v. Guilbert (1907), 77 Ohio St. 333, 338-339, 83 N.E. 80, 81. Indeed the ......
-
Phyllis M. Howard v. Betty Wills, Et. Al.
...the court in Jones cited for the definition from which it perceived other Ohio courts as retreating. Thus, if not a sub silento reversal, the Muze decision least strikes a severe blow to the foundational underpinnings of Jones and its progeny. Consequently, we do not rely on that analysis h......
-
Sturm v. Sturm
...action. This court has recently rejected the view that "costs" would include attorney fees under Civ.R. 41(D). Muze v. Mayfield (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 173, 573 N.E.2d 1078. In Muze, an action was dismissed by agreement of the parties without prejudice under Civ.R. 41(A)(1)(b). When the plain......