Mydell v. State

Decision Date02 March 1977
Docket NumberNo. 31934,31934
CitationMydell v. State, 233 S.E.2d 199, 238 Ga. 450 (Ga. 1977)
PartiesJames Marion MYDELL v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

James M. Mydell, pro se.

Robert Paul Phillips, III, Savannah, for appellant.

Andrew J. Ryan, III, Dist. Atty., Robert M. Hitch, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Savannah, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., B. Dean Grindle, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice.

Appellant was convicted of armed robbery of a fast food store and sentenced to life imprisonment.He appeals.

1.The evidence supports the verdict.The cashier made a positive untainted identification of appellant.The manager positively identified appellant as being in the store immediately preceding the robbery.Although the stolen money was not recovered the corpus delicti was proved.

2.Life imprisonment is a statutory penalty for armed robbery and is not cruel and inhumane punishment.Appellant's contention that his sentence is excessive may be presented to the sentence review board as provided in Code Ann. § 27-2511.1.

3.The alleged disqualification of a grand juror should have been raised before the indictment was returned.Parris v. State, 125 Ga. 777(4), 54 S.E. 751(1906).

Judgment affirmed.

All the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Chappell v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 1982
    ...has found that a sentence of life imprisonment for the crime of armed robbery was not cruel and inhuman punishment. Mydell v. State, 238 Ga. 450(2), 233 S.E.2d 199, U.S. cert. den., 431 U.S. 970, 97 S.Ct. 2933, 53 L.Ed.2d 1068. Accordingly, we find this enumeration to be without 5. We do no......
  • State ex rel. Leach v. Hamilton
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1980
    ...not cruel and unusual punishment for second-degree murder); State v. Watson, 294 N.C. 159, 240 S.E.2d 440 (1978), and Mydell v. State, 238 Ga. 450, 233 S.E.2d 199 (1977) (life sentence for armed robbery does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment); Phipps v. State, 39 Md.App. 206, 385 ......
  • Knight v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1977
    ...robbers to carry out their plan were never recovered, the corpus delicti of a robbery was sufficiently established. Mydell v. State, 238 Ga. 450, 233 S.E.2d 199 (1977). For these reasons the aforementioned enumerations of error are without 2. Appellants' enumeration No. 4, complaining that ......
  • Fain v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 1983
    ...is meritless because the sentences are within the statutory limits. Code Ann. § 26-2801(c) (now OCGA § 16-5-70(c)); see Mydell v. State, 238 Ga. 450(2), 233 S.E.2d 199, cert. den., 431 U.S. 970, 97 S.Ct. 2933, 53 L.Ed.2d 1068 5. Defendant Kenneth Fain asserts that the trial court erred in r......
  • Get Started for Free