Myers v. City of Defiance

Decision Date28 March 1940
Citation36 N.E.2d 162,67 Ohio App. 159
PartiesMYERS v. CITY OF DEFIANCE.
CourtOhio Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

1. A municipal ordinance requiring all persons, firms or corporations, engaged in the business of dry cleaning and pressing, to secure a license, and, when a dry cleaning and pressing establishment is located outside of the municipality, as a prerequisite to the issuance of a license requiring the owner or operator thereof to give a $1,000 cash bond, conditioned that all property removed from the municipality will be accounted for, imposes an excessive and unjustifiable burden on dry cleaning establishments located outside the municipality and violates both Section 1, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution.

2. An action for a declaratory judgment being a special statutory proceeding, not cognizable in chancery, is not appealable on questions of law and fact, but if the allegations in a petition state a cause of action for affirmative relief in equity by way of injunction, an appeal on questions of law and fact is proper in such action notwithstanding the fact that the prayer of the petition asks for a declaratory judgment.

Walter S. Jackson, of Lima, and John Marsh, Jr., of Delphos, for appellant.

E L. Clemens, of Defiance, for appellee.

GUERNSEY Judge.

This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Defiance county, Ohio.

In his petition the plaintiff asks for a declaratory judgment that certain provisions of an ordinance of the city of Definance, entitled 'An ordinance regulating dry cleaning, dyeing, pressing, carpet cleaning, laundering and hat cleaning establishments and solicitors,' are unconstitutional and void in that these provisions are in excess of the legislative power of the council of the city; are unreasonable, arbitrary and oppressive; are discriminatory and constitute class legislation; and are designed to exclude competition and the conducting of business by those other than residents of Defiance, Ohio. It is further alleged that the ordinance does not effect the purpose in its title or bear any real or substantial relation thereto; and that the provisions of the ordinance are in contravention of the constitutional rights of the plaintiff as guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the state of Ohio and of the United States. Although a declaratory judgment was sought, the allegations of this petition are broad enough to entitle the plaintiff to affirmative relief by way of injunction against the enforcement of these provisions. The prayer of the petition, in addition to asking for declaratory judgment as mentioned, asks for such other and further relief as the plaintiff may be entitled to either in law or in equity.

An action for declaratory judgment, being a special statutory proceeding not cognizable in a court of chancery, is not such an action as may be appealed to this court on questions of law and fact under the provisions of Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution. But as the petition in the instant action, although asking for a declaratory judgment, states a cause of action for affirmative relief in equity, the action constitutes a chancery case appealable to this court on questions of law and fact, and the appeal will be so considered.

By agreement of the parties the case is submitted to this court on an agreed statement of facts which, omitting the caption and exhibit thereto attached, is as follows:

'It is stipulated and agreed by and between C. H. Myers d. b. a. Myers Cleaners, plaintiff herein, and Erwin Clemens, as legal counsel and city solicitor of Defiance, Ohio, that this cause is hereby submitted to the court upon the pleadings and the following statements; however, it is agreed that this stipulation shall be considered and made a part of the proceedings and record in this action.

'Stipulations.

'That on or about the 2nd day of October 1934, the council of the city of Defiance, Ohio, duly passed ordinance No. 1024, titled 'An ordinance regulating and licensing dry cleaning, dyeing, pressing, carpet cleaning, laundering and hat cleaning establishments and solicitors,' which said ordinance now appears as being in full force and effect in said city, and is in the words and figures, as follows, to wit:

"Ordinance No. 1024.

"An ordinance regulating and licensing dry cleaning, dyeing, pressing, carpet cleaning, laundering and hat cleaning establishments and solicitors.
"Be It Resolved by the Council of the City of Defiance, State of Ohio:
"Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to engage in the business of dry cleaning, pressing or laundering of clothing, wearing apparel, household furnishings, linens or wash goods of any kind, or to solicit any such business in the city of Defiance, Ohio, without first applying to the mayor for a license to do so, which application shall state the name under which such business is operated and the names of the officers or individuals conducting the same, together with the place of business and the location of the establishment at which the work is actually done, and the name of the person, firm or corporation that owns or operates the establishment where said work is actually carried on. The fee for such license to be the sum of five ($5) dollars per annum, which license shall be obtained on or before the first day of June each year and expiring at midnight on the 31st day of May of each year.
"Section 2. In all instances where it appears from the application that the establishment, where such work is carried on and such cleaning, pressing or laundering done, is owned or operated by any other person than the applicant, it is mandatory that the applicant in the conduct of such business and in any and all advertising of every kind and nature, state that said applicant is acting only in the capacity as agent for the person, firm or corporation actually doing the cleaning or pressing and stating the location of said establishment; and where it appears from the application that neither the establishment where such cleaning or pressing or both are carried on is located in the city of Defiance, Ohio, it shall be necessary for such applicant, Before a license may be issued, to deposit with the city treasurer a bond in the sum of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) cash, conditioned that such applicant, person, firm or corporation, shall well and truly account for all property removed from the city of Defiance, Ohio, for either cleaning or pressing purposes, or both, and in case of loss or destruction indemnify owners of such property for the value thereof.
"The provision requiring a cash bond shall not apply however to any person, firm or corporation who maintains and operates in the city of Defiance, Ohio, an establishment where either the cleaning or the pressing or both are carried on. The said bond shall remain in the hands of the treasurer for ninety days after the last day of operation by said person, firm or corporation in said city of Defiance.
"Section 3. If applicant is a corporation and does not have its office and principal place of business in Defiance, Ohio, or if any individual or partnership and such individual and all of said partners do not reside in said city of Defiance, the applicant shall give the name and address of such adult person, resident of the city of Defiance, Ohio, upon whom service of summons can be had in any civil action brought against said applicant by any resident of the city of Defiance, Ohio. Said applicant shall expressly agree in said application that service of summons upon the agent so designated in any civil action brought against said applicant by any resident of said city of Defiance, Ohio, shall be service upon the principal and shall be recognized in any court of law in Defiance county, Ohio, as good and valid service upon said principal.
"Section 4. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not to exceed three hundred ($300) dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not to exceed thirty (30) days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
"Section 5. If any section of the ordinance shall be declared null and void, the other sections shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect. "Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
"Passed: October 2nd, 1934.
"Approved: October 2nd, 1934. Joe C. Krutsch, Mayor.
"Attest: W. A. Hull, Clerk.
"John K. Bridenbaugh,
"President of Council.
"I, W. A. Hull, clerk of council of the city of Defiance, Ohio, hereby certify that the above and foregoing ordinance No. 1024 was duly and regularly published in The Defiance Crescent News, an independent paper, published and of general circulation in the city of Defiance, Ohio, on October 6th and 13th, 1934.'
'That the first license as issued under ordinance No. 1024 in said city of Definance, Ohio, to any firm, person, partnership, or corporation was issued as of the 20th day of September 1938.
'That on or about the 9th day of September 1938, Joe C. Krutsch, mayor of the city of Definance, Ohio, forwarded by mail to Myers Cleaners at 516 Clinton street, Defiance, Ohio, a letter or notice, in the words and figures, to wit:

"September 9th, 1938.

"To: Myers Cleaners

"516 Clinton St., City.

"Honorable Personnel:
"You are hereby notified that it is the intention of the city of Defiance to enforce ordinance No. 1024, regulating and licensing dry cleaning, dyeing, pressing, carpet cleaning, laundering and hat cleaning establishments and solicitors
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT