Myers v. Merit Elec., LLC
| Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | KRAMER, JUDGE |
| Decision Date | 09 October 2020 |
| Docket Number | NO. 2020-CA-0634-WC,2020-CA-0634-WC |
| Citation | Myers v. Merit Elec., LLC, NO. 2020-CA-0634-WC (Ky. Ct. App. Oct 09, 2020) |
| Parties | XENIA R. MYERS APPELLANT v. MERIT ELECTRIC, LLC; HON. BRENT E. DYE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; and WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD APPELLEES |
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD
OPINIONAFFIRMING
** ** ** ** **
BEFORE: ACREE, KRAMER, AND TAYLOR, JUDGES.
KRAMER, JUDGE: Xenia R. Myers appeals from a March 6, 2020 opinion of the Workers' Compensation Board ("Board"). In Western Baptist Hospital v. Kelly, 827 S.W.2d 685 (Ky. 1992), the Kentucky Supreme Court described the role of the Court of Appeals in reviewing decisions of the Board: "The function of further review of the WCB in the Court of Appeals is to correct the Board only where the [] Court perceives the Board has overlooked or misconstrued controlling statutes or precedent, or committed an error in assessing the evidence so flagrant as to cause gross injustice." Id. at 687-88. Here, the arguments Myers advances in this appeal are duplicative of what she asserted before the Board. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, the arguments of the parties, and the law. Upon our review, we conclude that the Board's dispositions of Myers' arguments, as set forth in its opinion, were not in error, but rather were indicative of a thorough understanding of the underlying evidence and a correct application of the law. We therefore affirm and adopt the Board's opinion as follows:
Xenia R. Myers ("Myers") seeks review of the October 1, 2018, Opinion, Award, and Order of Hon. Brent E. Dye, Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") finding she sustained a work-related injury on March 25, 2008, and awarding income and medical benefits. Myers sustained a horrendous work injury when her mini-excavator overturned crushing her left foot. Ultimately, her left leg below-the-knee had to be amputated. The ALJ awarded periods of temporary total disability ("TTD") benefits, permanent partial disability ("PPD") benefits, and medical benefits. Myers also appeals from the October 30, 2019, Order denying her petition for reconsideration.[FN]
[FN] In the same order, the ALJ granted the Respondent's petition for reconsideration relating to the rendition date of the opinion.
On appeal, Myers challenges the decision on four grounds. Myers first argues the ALJ erred inrecalculating the impairment rating of Dr. Robert Jacob. Myers then contends the ALJ incorrectly determined she attained maximum medical improvement ("MMI") sometime after the surgery amputating her left leg. Myers maintains the ALJ should have found she did not attain MMI until sometime after her March 4, 2016, revision surgery. Next, Myers argues the ALJ erred in accepting Dr. Walter Butler's 5% impairment rating for the psychological injury and in rejecting the 50 to 55% impairment rating assessed by Dr. William Wilkerson. Finally, Myers argues the ALJ erred in not finding she is totally occupationally disabled.
BACKGROUND
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting