Myers v. State, No. BL-296

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtMILLS
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 102,499 So.2d 895
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 102 Paul MYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. BL-296
Decision Date18 December 1986

Page 895

499 So.2d 895
12 Fla. L. Weekly 102
Paul MYERS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BL-296.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
First District.
Dec. 18, 1986.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1987.

Page 896

Michael Allen, Public Defender; Ann Cocheu, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen.; Maria Ines Suber, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

Myers appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted burglary of a dwelling, raising three issues for our consideration: (1) whether the trial court erred in permitting one of the jurors to take notes during the trial for use in the jury room; (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to require corroboration of statements contained in Myers' presentencing investigation report; and (3) whether the trial court made the requisite factual findings pursuant to Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1983), to support a habitual felony offender determination. We find no error and affirm.

Myers was charged with attempted burglary of a dwelling with the intent to commit an offense therein and proceeded to a jury trial on 17 December 1985. After opening statements, Myers objected to one of the jurors taking notes. The objection was overruled. Following the State's case, Myers again objected to the note-taking and moved for a mistrial on this ground. The trial court denied the motion and Myers rested his case. He was convicted of the crime charged.

Thereafter, the State filed a notice to seek sentencing of Myers as a habitual offender. Accordingly, the trial court ordered a presentencing investigation report (PSI) be performed. At the sentencing hearing, the State submitted an affidavit from the Florida Department of Corrections which stated Myers had been released from custody on 25 June 1985. Myers objected to the affidavit and to the judgments

Page 897

alleged to be his on the grounds that they were hearsay. He requested direct evidence and fingerprint identification. The trial court overruled Myers' objection and noted he had the burden to contradict or dispute the PSI report by bringing forth evidence.

The trial court declared Myers to be a habitual offender, providing a written order to that effect, and sentenced him to ten years of incarceration. Myers' sentencing guideline scoresheet showed a recommended term of imprisonment of 27-40 years. This timely appeal then ensued.

Myers contends the trial court's failure to stop the note-taking of one juror, its failure to provide some instruction as to the proper role of note-taking, and its failure to stop the juror from taking his notes into the jury room during deliberations was an abuse of discretion. However, the Florida Supreme Court in Kelley v. State, 486 So.2d 578 (Fla.1986), held that it is within the discretion of the trial court to allow a jury to take notes and to use those notes in the deliberation process. Implicitly, this ruling allows notes made by a juror to be taken into the jury room, as was done here.

The problem in the present case is that the trial court provided no instructions whatsoever to the jury on the proper use of notes during their deliberations. Nonetheless, we find no error. While it is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Price v. State, 264-94
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • 30 Noviembre 1994
    ...A.R.S. Rules of Crim.Proc., Rule 18.6(d). 6 See, People v. Guzman, 45 Cal.3d 915, 248 Cal.Rptr. 467, 755 P.2d 917 (1988); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla.App. 1 Dist., 1986); and, Watkins v. State, 216 Tenn. 545, 393 S.W.2d 141 7 See, State v. Groves, 311 So.2d 230 (La.1975); State v. Mo......
  • Hall v. State, BQ-408
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 5 Agosto 1987
    ...range, Hoefert v. State, 509 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987); Winters v. State, 500 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), or departs from the guidelines range for valid reasons other than habitual-offender status, Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1342, 1......
  • Junco v. State, s. 82-2138
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 17 Febrero 1987
    ...exception, or motion below. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32 (Fla.1985); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Robinson v. State, 498 So.2d 626 (Fla. 1st DCA The following portion of the record shows that Junco's counsel's object......
  • Inscho v. State, 87-437
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 4 Febrero 1988
    ...1987); Holmes v. State, 502 So.2d Page 166 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Winters v. State, 500 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA In Whitehead the supreme court, in holding that the status of the habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT