N.J. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Dailey
Decision Date | 03 February 1938 |
Parties | NEW JERSEY TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST CO. v. DAILEY et al. |
Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The court's main concern, in the construction of a will, is not so much what the testator meant to say, as it is to determine what he meant by what he did say.
2. Executors and trustees in a consideration of the testator's wife's application for moneys, made in accordance with the provisions of the will, for "so much of the principal * * * as she may desire," are not licensed to say what sum she shall receive.
Suit for the construction of a will by the New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Company, as an executor of the will of Harry Dailey, deceased, against Charlotte R. Dailey, individually and as an executrix of and trustee under the will of Harry Dailey, deceased, and others.
Decree in accordance with opinion.
Collins & Corbin, of Jersey City, for complainant. Thomas B. Davidson, of Jersey City, for defendant Charlotte R. Dailey. Lehlbach, Johnson & Ormond, of Newark, for defendants Jannie R. and William B. Nevius.
EGAN, Vice Chancellor.
The questions coming up for determination arise from the submission of the following stipulation of facts:
Jersey City, N. J.
"'Charles L. Carrick, 103 Gifford Ave.,
Jersey City, N. J.'
The defendants Jannie R. and William B. Nevius, say: That a consideration of the entire will, and the circumstances, and age, of the widow suggest the inference that the testator had in mind, when he executed his will, a reasonable competence for his wife during the period of her life, and that this purpose will be defeated if the trustees are given...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Day v. Grossman, A--39
...of judicial interference the amount of the annuity to be paid in excess of the stated minimum. Cf. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Dailey, 123 N.J.Eq. 205, 209, 196 A. 703 (Ch.1938). So, in her prayer for assistance the plaintiff obviously implored the court to direct the trustee ......
-
Hicks v. Jones
...307, 79 A. 275, affirmed 79 N.J.Eq. 643, 83 A. 1118; Gluckman v. Roberson, 116 N.J.Eq. 531, 174 A. 488; New Jersey Title Guarantee, etc., Co. v. Dailey, 123 N.J.Eq. 205, 196 A. 703; Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Read, 124 N.J.Eq. 599, 4 A.2d 10; Commonwealth-Merchants Trust Co. v. Segl......
-
Fid. Union Trust Co. v. Noll
...and income of estate when will was made, on question whether annuities were payable out of principal); New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Dailey, 123 N.J.Eq. 205, 196 A. 703, 706 ("All the facts and circumstances"); Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Fitler, 123 N.J.Eq. 245, 197 A. 2......
-
Stryker v. Sands, A--80
...is not so much what the testator meant to say as it is to determine what he meant by what he did say. N.J. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Dailey, 123 N.J.Eq. 205, 196 A. 703 (Ch.1938); Summit Trust Co. v. McAuley Water St. Mission, 125 N.J.Eq. 505, 6 A.2d 406 (E. & In a very recent decision......