Nacogdoches Independent School Dist. v. McKinney

Decision Date17 July 1974
Docket NumberNo. B--3826,B--3826
Citation513 S.W.2d 5
PartiesNACOGDOCHES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. R. W. McKINNEY.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Benchoff & Guidry, William D. Guidry and Edmund F. Benchoff, Nacogdoches, for petitioner.

Pye & Dobbs, J. Robert Dobbs, Jr., Tyler, Barrow, Bland Rehmet & Lee, David Bland, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This suit is by the Nacogdoches Independent School District against R. W. McKinney to recover taxes. This Court reversed the Court of Civil Appeals judgment that had affirmed in part the trial court's judgment against R. W. McKinney. 504 S.W.2d 832. Our judgment improperly adjudged the costs in this Court and the Court of Civil Appeals against the School District.

The School District is exempt from payment of any court costs in a suit to recover taxes. Its motion to readjudicate costs is well taken. Electra Independent School District v. W. T. Waggoner Estate, 140 Tex. 483, 168 S.W.2d 645 (1943); City of Waco v. O. O. Owens, 442 S.W.2d 324 (Tex.1969). Also see this Court's order in Whelan v. State, 155 Tex. 14, 282 S.W.2d 378 (1955). As to the winning taxpayer, there has been inconsistency in the above cases as to what portion of the costs should be taxed. We follow Electra, supra, which required the winning taxpayer to pay only those costs incurred by him. This follows more nearly the spirit of Rule 127, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides as follows:

'Each party to a suit shall be liable for all costs incurred by him. If the costs cannot be collected from the party against whom they have been adjudged, execution may issue against any party in such suit for the amount of costs incurred by such party, but no more.'

Since this Court still has jurisdiction of the cause, it may, and does now, correct its judgment as to court costs as follows:

All court costs incurred by the defendant, R. W. McKinney, in this Court are adjudged against him and no costs are adjudged against Nacogdoches Independent School District.

All costs in the lower courts shall remain adjudged against said defendant as provided by the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, the defendant not having appealed from that portion of the judgment. Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., 140 Tex. 322, 167 S.W.2d 727 (1943).

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Davis v. City of Austin
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • March 17, 1982
    ...785 (1922); accord, Nacogdoches Independent School District v. McKinney, 504 S.W.2d 832, 837-38 (Tex.), modified on other grounds, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974); Ferris v. Kimble, 75 Tex. 476, 480, 12 S.W. 689, 690 A tax authority establishing its prima facie case in a tax delinquency suit enjoys......
  • City of Corpus Christi v. Davis
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
    • October 19, 1978
    ...... CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, Corpus Christi Independent School . District, and Corpus Christi Junior College . ...Hues, 540 S.W.2d 485, 489 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1976, writ ref'd n. r. e.); United States Fidelity & ... City of Nacogdoches Independent School Dist. v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 ......
  • Bailey v. Cherokee County Appraisal Dist.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Texas
    • September 29, 1993
    ...... See Nacogdoches Indep. School Dist. v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974) (winning ......
  • Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Dickinson Independent School Dist., 9759
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • May 8, 1990
    ...... El Campo Independent School District v. Kimmey, 571 S.W.2d 865, 866 (Tex.1978); Nacogdoches Independent School District v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974).         To this extent, we grant the taxing units' motion for rehearing. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT