Nacogdoches Independent School Dist. v. McKinney
Decision Date | 17 July 1974 |
Docket Number | No. B--3826,B--3826 |
Citation | 513 S.W.2d 5 |
Parties | NACOGDOCHES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. R. W. McKINNEY. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Benchoff & Guidry, William D. Guidry and Edmund F. Benchoff, Nacogdoches, for petitioner.
Pye & Dobbs, J. Robert Dobbs, Jr., Tyler, Barrow, Bland Rehmet & Lee, David Bland, Houston, for respondent.
This suit is by the Nacogdoches Independent School District against R. W. McKinney to recover taxes. This Court reversed the Court of Civil Appeals judgment that had affirmed in part the trial court's judgment against R. W. McKinney. 504 S.W.2d 832. Our judgment improperly adjudged the costs in this Court and the Court of Civil Appeals against the School District.
The School District is exempt from payment of any court costs in a suit to recover taxes. Its motion to readjudicate costs is well taken. Electra Independent School District v. W. T. Waggoner Estate, 140 Tex. 483, 168 S.W.2d 645 (1943); City of Waco v. O. O. Owens, 442 S.W.2d 324 (Tex.1969). Also see this Court's order in Whelan v. State, 155 Tex. 14, 282 S.W.2d 378 (1955). As to the winning taxpayer, there has been inconsistency in the above cases as to what portion of the costs should be taxed. We follow Electra, supra, which required the winning taxpayer to pay only those costs incurred by him. This follows more nearly the spirit of Rule 127, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides as follows:
Since this Court still has jurisdiction of the cause, it may, and does now, correct its judgment as to court costs as follows:
All court costs incurred by the defendant, R. W. McKinney, in this Court are adjudged against him and no costs are adjudged against Nacogdoches Independent School District.
All costs in the lower courts shall remain adjudged against said defendant as provided by the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, the defendant not having appealed from that portion of the judgment. Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co., 140 Tex. 322, 167 S.W.2d 727 (1943).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. City of Austin
...785 (1922); accord, Nacogdoches Independent School District v. McKinney, 504 S.W.2d 832, 837-38 (Tex.), modified on other grounds, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974); Ferris v. Kimble, 75 Tex. 476, 480, 12 S.W. 689, 690 A tax authority establishing its prima facie case in a tax delinquency suit enjoys......
-
City of Corpus Christi v. Davis
...... CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, Corpus Christi Independent School . District, and Corpus Christi Junior College . ...Hues, 540 S.W.2d 485, 489 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1976, writ ref'd n. r. e.); United States Fidelity & ... City of Nacogdoches Independent School Dist. v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 ......
-
Bailey v. Cherokee County Appraisal Dist.
...... See Nacogdoches Indep. School Dist. v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974) (winning ......
-
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Dickinson Independent School Dist., 9759
...... El Campo Independent School District v. Kimmey, 571 S.W.2d 865, 866 (Tex.1978); Nacogdoches Independent School District v. McKinney, 513 S.W.2d 5 (Tex.1974). To this extent, we grant the taxing units' motion for rehearing. ......