Nadal v. Britton

Decision Date28 February 1893
Citation112 N.C. 180,16 S.E. 914
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesNADAL, et al. v. BRITTON et al.

Fraudulent Conveyance—Knowledge of Grantee—Evidence.

1. Where the validity of a debt due defendant from her deceased husband is admitted, but the trust deed which he executed to secure such debt is attacked as in fraud of creditors, the burden of proof is on those alleging fraud, and they must prove not only the fraudulent intent of the grantor, but also that defendant had knowledge of and participated in such intent.

2. The fact that the husband was in debt at the time of the execution of the deed; that he had little property except the house and lot conveyed; and that the other creditors knew nothing of the debt due to his wife, or of the deed in trust to secure it, —does not tend to establish fraudulent intent on the part of the husband.

3. The bona fides of the debt being admitted, and the execution and delivery of the trust deed being established, the fact that it was withheld from registration for about two y'ears does not show fraud, there being no evidence that while so withholding the deed defendant induced any one to give credit to her husband on the faith of his being the absolute owner of the property.

4. The fact that defendant told two of plaintiffs, when they visited her husband in his last illness, that he owed nothing, and it would not be necessary to sell the house and lot, which she wished her daughters to have, does not tend to show that she had any knowledge that her husband, when he borrowed her money and secured its repayment by the deed in trust, was contriving to hinder or defraud creditors.

Appeal from superior court, Wilson county; Bryan, Judge.

Action by E. M. Nadal and others against E. E. Britton, administrator, and others, to set aside a trust deed. From the judgment setting aside the deed, defendants appeal. Reversed.

T. W. Strange, for appellants.

J. E. Woodard, Batclielor & Devereux, G. W. Mount, and Jacob Battle, for appellees.

Burwell, J. The plaintiffs are creditors of R. W. King, deceased. The defendants arehis administrator and his widow. The object of this action is to have declared fraudulent and Void a deed in trust, made in February, 1887, by R. W. King to Peter Hines, to secure a debt of $2,500, due from him to his wife. This deed was not registered till January, 1880, a few days after the death of King. Two issues were submitted to the jury, (neither party objecting thereto,) as follows: (1) AVas the trust deed executed and delivered? (2) Was said deed made with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors? His honor instructed the jury to answer the first issue in the affirmative. To this the plaintiffs did not except. The fact that R. W. King was justly indebted to his wife, at the date of the execution and delivery of this deed, to the amount thereby secured to her, does not seem to have been controverted. Indeed, the amended complaint makes no allegation that the debt was not a just one, and avers that " the defendant Carrie J. King holds a note against her deceased husband, dated February 15, 1887, for $2,500." The bona fides of the debt and the execution and delivery of the trust deed are thusestablished. His honor was asked to charge the jury that there was no evidence...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Smith v. Moore
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1906
    ... ... the parties without registration, which is required only to ... protect the grantee against creditors and subsequent ... purchasers. Nadal v. Britton, 112 N.C. 180, 16 S.E ... 914. But she says that withholding this deed from record was ... some evidence of a purpose to conceal it, ... ...
  • Paulson v. Ward
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1894
    ...taking the conveyances was to secure an honest indebtedness owing by the grantors to him. Cooper v. Bank (Ala.) 11 South. 760;Nadal v. Britton (N. C.) 16 S. E. 914;Young v. Clapp (Ill. Sup.) 32 N. E. 187;Bannister v. Phelps, 81 Wis. 256, 51 N. W. 417. It is claimed that such was the case in......
  • Lockren v. Rustan
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1899
    ...will in no manner taint the transaction. Paulson v. Ward, 4 N. D. 106, 58 N. W. 792;Cooper v. Bank (Ala.) 11 South. 760;Nadal v. Britton (N. C.) 16 S. E. 914;Young v. Clapp (Ill. Sup.) 32 N. E. 187;Bannister v. Phelps, 81 Wis. 256, 51 N. W. 417;Coal Co. v. Burnham (Neb.) 72 N. W. 487;Koch v......
  • Howard v. Early
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 13, 1900
    ...(wife) participated in, or had knowledge of, such intent. On this ground there was error, in the judgment entered. In Nadal v. Britton, 112 N. C. 187, 16 S. E. 914, the facts are similar, and the issue was the same as in the present case, and the response was the same. The court used this l......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT