Nahoom v. Nahoom, s. 75--1835
Decision Date | 04 January 1977 |
Docket Number | 75--1836,Nos. 75--1835,s. 75--1835 |
Citation | 341 So.2d 257 |
Parties | Karen C. NAHOOM, Appellant, v. Kerry J. NAHOOM, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Rosenberg, Rosenberg, Reisman & Glass, Miami, for appellant.
Druck, Grimmett, Norman, Weaver & Scherer, Fort Lauderdale, Harold F. Keefe, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
By these appeals, the former wife of the appellee raises the question of whether the trial court has jurisdiction to change the provisions of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage after the judgment has become final.
On August 1, 1975, the trial court entered a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which provided, in part, as follows:
'In addition, during the period from June through August, in the years 1976 and 1977, the Respondent shall pay to Petitioner as and for additional child support the sum of TWO HUNDRED ($200.00) DOLLARS each year.
This judgment was pursuant to an oral announcement made at the conclusion of the cause where the court stated, in part, as follows:
On September 15, 1975, a motion to amend a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harrell v. Harrell, 86-2642
...should not have modified the payment terms, even though the order may have more fully expressed the court's intentions. Nahoom v. Nahoom, 341 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); accord Frumkes v. Frumkes, 328 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); McEachin v. McEachin, 154 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963); se......
-
Migliore v. Migliore, s. 97-1521
...Inc. v. Swanko, 419 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); St. Cloud Utils. v. Moore, 410 So.2d 973 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Nahoom v. Nahoom, 341 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) and Bescar Enters., Inc. v. Rotenberger, 221 So.2d 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)(In none of these cases did the use of the word ......
-
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Walker, 81-64
...Kippy Corp. v. Colburn, 177 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1965); In re Estate of Beeman, 391 So.2d 276, 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Nahoom v. Nahoom, 341 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We hold that it was. 4 As the familiar rule was succinctly stated in Slatcoff v. Dezen, 72 So.2d 800 (Fla.1954), "the test o......
-
Travel Is Fun, Inc. v. Hartnett, 77-2381
...requirements of law in affirming this order on appeal. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pearson, 236 So.2d 1 (Fla.1970); Nahoom v. Nahoom, 341 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Fiber Crete Homes, Inc. v. Division of Administration, 315 So.2d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Investment Corp. of South Flor......