Naiden v. Epps
Decision Date | 30 December 1993 |
Citation | 867 P.2d 215 |
Docket Number | 93CA0007 |
Parties | Era NAIDEN and Neil Naiden, Petitioners, v. Penny A. EPPS and The Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado, Respondents. . I |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Marcus v. Holley
...governmental interests. Thus, the court found no violation of equal protection. 440 N.W.2d at 520. Similarly, in Naiden v. Epps, 867 P.2d 215 (Colo.App.1993) the court found no equal protection violation in a statutory scheme which distinguished between employees working forty or more hours......
-
Romero v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo.
...School District v. Rodriguez, supra; Higgs v. Western Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc., 804 P.2d 161 (Colo.1991); Naiden v. Epps, 867 P.2d 215 (Colo.App.1993). There is an "intermediate" standard of review which has also been used, under which the state has the burden of proving that t......
-
Waddell v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 97CA0611
...statute bears the burden of proving it to be unconstitutional. Firelock Inc. v. District Court, 776 P.2d 1090 (Colo.1989); Naiden v. Epps, 867 P.2d 215 (Colo.App.1993). Because fundamental rights are not implicated by the Workers' Compensation Act, § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S.1997, the ratio......
-
Colorado AFL-CIO v. Donlon, AFL-CIO
...anything other than proper legislative line-drawing. See Firelock, Inc. v. District Court, 776 P.2d 1090 (Colo.1989); Naiden v. Epps, 867 P.2d 215 (Colo.App.1993). Although there are, admittedly, some differences in the underlying purposes served by temporary and permanent benefits, given t......
Request a trial to view additional results