Nall v. Malley, 2420.

Citation55 S.W.2d 593
Decision Date15 December 1932
Docket NumberNo. 2420.,2420.
PartiesNALL v. MALLEY et ux.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; Geo. C. O'Brien, Judge.

Suit by Joe Malley and wife against E. L. Nall. From a temporary restraining order, defendant appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

E. L. Nall, of Beaumont, for appellant.

E. M. Venable, of Beaumont, for appellees.

WALKER, C. J.

By their petition filed in this case, appellees alleged that they were the owners of certain real estate in the city of Beaumont; that appellant held notes against this property in the sum of more than $1,700; that appellant was about to foreclose his lien against this property; and further, certain facts as a basis for enjoining appellant from foreclosing his lien. On the facts alleged, they made the following prayer: "Wherefore plaintiffs pray that they be granted a writ of injunction against defendant, and that he be enjoined and restrained from selling said property as aforesaid, or any part thereof. That defendants be cited to appear and answer this petition, and that on final hearing defendants be enjoined from making such foreclosure and said sale for a period of ninety days from the date of filing this petition, and for such other relief general and special as plaintiffs may show themselves entitled."

Upon presentation of their petition to the district judge of the Fifty-Eighth district court of Jefferson county, he indorsed thereon his flat, as follows:

"State of Texas, County of Jefferson

                    "At Chambers This 27th day of October
                      1932
                

"The above petition having been presented to and heard by the judge of the 58th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, at chambers, this 27th day of October, 1932, and it appearing to him from the facts stated therein that the plaintiff, applicant is entitled to a temporary restraining order, that same is within complainants allegations and prayer, that delay will not be injurious to either party, and that justice may be subserved thereby, it is accordingly ordered that the clerk of this court issue a temporary restraining order, operative until and pending the hearing below ordered, restraining defendants from selling or in any way disposing of the property described in said petition upon plaintiffs executing a good and sufficient bond, with two or more sufficient securities in the sum of $100.00 conditioned as the law requires. The Clerk shall quote this fiat and embody such order in a writ,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Smith v. Coleman
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 20, 1939
    ...Ann. Cas.1917B, 121. And there is authority to the effect that no appeal lies from a mere temporary restraining order. Nall v. Malley, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 593; Lokey v. Elliott, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 126; 24 Tex.Jur. sec. 234, p. 291; Railroad Commission of Texas v. Real, Tex.Civ. App......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 19, 1940
    ...Mickle v. Garrett, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 1235; Swift v. Callaghan Land & Pastoral Co., Tex.Civ. App., 120 S.W.2d 459; Nall v. Malley, Tex.Civ.App., 55 S.W.2d 593. Although we are required to dismiss the appeal we deem it proper to observe that, in our opinion, Articles 666— 29 and 667—27......
  • Arvol D. Hays Construction Co. v. R & M Agency Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
    • September 17, 1971
    ...the temporary restraining order is not appealable. 31 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 207, p. 325, and authorities there cited. See also Nall v. Malley, 55 S.W.2d 593 (Beaumont Civ.App., 1932, no writ hist .); Smith v. State, 140 S.W.2d 299, 301 (Eastland Civ.App., 1940, no writ hist.) citing numerous aut......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT