Napowsa v. Langston
| Decision Date | 07 December 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 393P89,393P89 |
| Citation | 325 N.C. 709,388 S.E.2d 460 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Patricia NAPOWSA v. William Dwight LANGSTON. |
Prior report: 95 N.C.App. 14, 381 S.E.2d 882.
R. Gene Edmundson, Emerald Isle, for defendant.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, for plaintiff.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Matter of Burkes
...verbatim, form. N.C.R. App. P.9(c)(1); see Napowsa v. Langston, 95 N.C. App. 14, 19, 381 S.E.2d 882, 885, disc. review denied, 325 N.C. 709, 388 S.E.2d 460 (1989). This Court has previously found the absence of a verbatim transcript not to be a circumstance requiring new trial. See Hunt v. ......
- Morris v. Terminix Co. of North Carolina, Inc.