Nash v. Gardner
Decision Date | 29 September 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 16914,16914 |
Citation | 226 S.C. 165,84 S.E.2d 375 |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | K. C. NASH, Appellant, v. Hattie GARDNER, Respondent. |
Robinson, Robinson & Dreher, Columbia, E. C. Dennis, Jr., Darlington, for appellant.
Tison & Tison, Hartsville, for respondent.
This appeal involves construction of the will of the late William H. Gardner and comes from the following agreed statement of facts:
William H. Gardner died in 1926 leaving a will dated April 8, 1919, and leaving surviving him his widow (who died intestate in 1942) and nine children, of whom respondent is one. The testator had a tenth child, Samuel, who died in 1922, leaving no wife or children surviving.
The case involves the ownership of a tract of three hundred acres, more or less, and known as the Home Place, which in the will of the above named testator was given to the son Samuel, subject to limitations contained in the will.
The provisions of the will pertinent to this case are items number Sixth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth. Appellant claims ownership of a fee simple title to the whole of said tract of land known as the Home Place. The title upon which appellant thus relies is the result of conveyances under which Etson Gardner acquired title to the property and conveyed the same to appellant, Nash. Respondent claims that by these conveyances and under the will Etson Gardner and consequently his grantee, Nash, only acquired eight-ninths of the property, the remaining one-ninth being vested in respondent, Hattie Gardner.
The case was referred for the taking of testimony and came on for hearing before Honorable J. Woodrow Lewis, Resident Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, who rendered his opinion wherein he found against the contentions of appellant and held that the respondent, Hattie Gardner, owned a one-ninth interest in the property, and awarded her judgment in the sum of $2,205.55 as her share of compensation for appellant's use of the land and for waste claimed to have been committed by appellant.
Notice of intention to appeal from such decree was duly served and filed.
The defendants Powe and Guy are not concerned with any of the issues involved in this case since it is stipulated that the mortgages to them mentioned in the pleadings and in the testimony involve an indebtedness of less than $2,000, and have been assigned to Samuel Want, Attorney, and that the assignee disclaims any lien upon or interest in the one-ninth interest in the property herein claimed to be owned by the respondent, Hattie Gardner.
The will under consideration reads as follows:
'State of South Carolina
'County of Chesterfield
'In the name of God, Amen:
'I William H. Gardner, of Darlington County, do make, ordain, publish and declare this as and for my last will and testament--hereby revoking all wills and instruments of a testamentary nature heretofore by me made.
'First: I commit my soul to the gracious God who gave it and direct that my body shall be decently interred according to the rites of the Baptist Church and that a suitable monument be erected to mark my grave and that all expenses incurred therefor be paid out of my estate.
'Second: I will and direct that my executors hereinafter named shall pay all my just debts with the first money coming into their hands.
'Eighth: I give and bequeath unto my daughter Mary Blackwell one thousand dollars in money.
'Ninth: I give and bequeath unto my daughter Julia Blackwell the sum of Two Hundred dollars in money.
'Tenth: I give and bequeath unto my daughter Daisy Bradshaw the sum of Two Hundred dollars in money.
'Eleventh: I give and bequeath unto my daughter Hattie Gardner the sum of Eight hundred and fifty dollars in money.
'Twelfth: It is my will and desire that my tract of land in Chesterfield County, Alligator Township in the State of South Carolina, known as my Curtis place be advertised and sold according to law and out of the proceeds of said sale the money herebefore mentioned shall be paid and balance of the proceeds of said sale if any there be shall belong and be paid over to my son W. H. Gardner, Jr., when he shall become twenty-one years of age.
'Thirteenth: I give and bequeath to each of the following daughters a milk cow, Julia Blackwell, Daisy Bradshaw and Hattie Gardner and if there should be no cow I desire and provide that they have property or money to the value of a cow.
'Fourteenth: It is further my will that when the provisions as heretofore mentioned has been complied with and all moneys paid as is before mentioned and provisions made for the marking of my wife Ola Gardners grave with stone, if there is any money or property real or personal remaining or belonging to my estate I give and bequeath the same to my four youngest sons, namely, Etson Gardner, Samuel Gardner, Miller Gardner, and W. H. Gardner, Jr.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watson v. Wall
...comfortably, and no more. No particular language is required to effect disposition of the entire residuum of the estate. Nash v. Gardner, 226 S.C. 165, 84 S.E.2d 375. If the intention to do so is apparent from the language used, it must be given effect. Such intention clearly appears upon c......
-
Nash v. Gardner
...suit between these parties was pending, which appears to be the action in which decision on appeal is reported as Nash v. Gardner, 226 S.C. 165, 84 S.E.2d 375. By decree dated May 1, 1957, the court denied the defendants' motions to reopen and amend and found in plaintiff's favor as to one ......
- South Carolina Mental Health Commission v. Smith, 16920