Nash v. Normandy State Bank

Decision Date10 March 1947
Docket Number39677
Citation201 S.W.2d 299
PartiesHelen C., R. B. Nash, Appellants, v. Normandy State Bank, Respondents
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

From the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Civil Appeal, Judge John Witthaus

Affirmed

OPINION

On Motion for Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

It should be conceded as plaintiffs-appellants urge, it is not always absolutely necessary that an actual falsehood should be uttered to render a person liable in an action for deceit. If "he states material facts as of his own knowledge, and not as a mere matter of opinion or general assertion, about a matter of which he has no knowledge whatever, this distinct willful statement in ignorance of the truth, is the same as the statement of a known falsehood, and will constitute a scienter." Dunn v. White, 63 Mo. 181, cited by appellants in support of the motion. It is also true, in order to render a person liable in an action of deceit, the person allegedly deceived must trust to the false representation and act "on the strength of it." Dunn v. White, supra.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT