Nat'l Sec. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Jenrette, Appellate Case No. 2014-001285

• Decision Date: 17 February 2016
• Docket Number: Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-067,Appellate Case No. 2014-001285
• Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals
• Parties: National Security Fire & Casualty Company, Plaintiff, v. Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, and Horry County State Bank, Defendants, Of whom Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, is the Appellant, and Horry County State Bank is the Respondent.

National Security Fire & Casualty Company, Plaintiff, v. Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette,and Horry County State Bank, Defendants,Of whom Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, is the Appellant,andHorry County State Bank is the Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001285

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-067

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Heard January 14, 2016

February 17, 2016

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Horry County

George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

William W. DesChamps, Jr. and William W.

Page 2

DesChamps, III, both of DesChamps Law Firm, of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

Randall K. Mullins and Jarrod E. Ownbey, both of Mullins Law Firm, PA, of North Myrtle Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: In this interpleader action, Rosemary Jenrette appeals the trial court's order awarding insurance proceeds to Horry County State Bank (the Bank). Jenrette argues the trial court erred in finding (1) the existence of an equitable lien in favor of the Bank on the insurance proceeds; (2) she was bound by a covenant in the mortgage to insure the subject property; and (3) the assignment provision in the subject mortgage survived the cancellation of the mortgage. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Fibkins v. Fibkins, 303 S.C. 112, 115, 399 S.E.2d 158, 160 (Ct. App. 1990) ("An action to establish an equitable lien is an action in equity."); Townes Assocs., Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 86, 221 S.E.2d 773, 775 (1976) (holding in an appeal of an action in equity, tried by the judge alone, the appellate court has jurisdiction to find facts in accordance with its views of the preponderance of the evidence); Blackwell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 237 S.C. 649, 653, 118 S.E.2d 701, 704 (1961) ("It is well settled that if the mortgagor is bound by covenant in the mortgage or otherwise to insure the mortgaged premises for the better security of the mortgagee, the latter will have an equitable lien upon the money due on a policy taken out by the mortgagor to the extent of the mortgagee's interest in the property damaged or destroyed."); Jones v. Equicredit Corp. of S.C., 347 S.C. 535, 543-44, 556 S.E.2d 713, 717-18 (Ct. App. 2001) (stating when a foreclosure sale does not satisfy the mortgage debt, the mortgagee is entitled to collect insurance...