National Carloading Corp. v. Gemini Transp., Inc., 77-2644

Decision Date07 November 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-2644,77-2644
Citation364 So.2d 504
PartiesNATIONAL CARLOADING CORP., a New Jersey Corporation, d/b/a ABC Air Freight Co., Appellant, v. GEMINI TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert L. Bell, Miami, for appellant.

Franklin, Ullman, Kimler & Entin, North Miami Beach and Ronald A. Dion, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the trial court, appeals an order dismissing his cause for lack of prosecution. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). We affirm upon a holding that the record clearly reflects plaintiff's failure to proceed with this case for the periods of time specified. See Leithauser v. Harrison, 206 So.2d 222, 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). 1

A further point by the plaintiff urges that the dismissal was improperly made "with prejudice." We agree, and strike from the order of dismissal the words "with prejudice" from the first line of the "ordered and adjudged" portion of the court's order of November 18, 1977, which is here appealed. Where the dismissal of an action is not upon the merits, the dismissal should be without prejudice. See Spolter Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Kalb, 275 So.2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

1 "On a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, the issue is simply and exclusively whether there has been a failure to prosecute. If no action towards prosecution has been taken within a year, the trial judge may not exercise his discretion and must dismiss the cause."

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Gries Inv. Co. v. Chelton
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 30, 1980
    ...final order for appeal purposes. See, e. g., Tapper v. Taunton, 371 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); National Carloading Corp. v. Gemini Transportation, Inc., 364 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). While the dismissal here was, in fact, an adjudication on the merits, see Florida Rule of Civil Proc......
  • Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. Beauvais
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2014
    ...added); CPI Mfg. Co. v. Industrias St. Jack's, S.A. De C.V., 870 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); NationalCarloading Corp. v. Gemini Transp., Inc., 364 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Milsaps v. Orlando Wrecker, Inc., 634 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In Singleton, the dismissal with prejudic......
  • Millsaps v. Orlando Wrecker, Inc., 92-2576
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 1994
    ...dismissal should not be with prejudice. Wemett v. Duval County, 485 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); National Carloading Corp. v. Gemini Transportation, Inc., 364 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). An order dismissing a cause for lack of an indispensable party is not an adjudication on the merits.......
  • Banco Del Comercio v. Barco, 79-2072
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 1980
    ...to make the dismissal without prejudice. Rashard v. Cappiali, 171 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); National Carloading Corp. v. Gemini Transportation, Inc., 364 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Affirmed as ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT