National City Bank v. Seattle Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 10 October 1922 |
Docket Number | 17283. |
Citation | 121 Wash. 476,209 P. 705 |
Parties | NATIONAL CITY BANK v. SEATTLE NAT. BANK. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 1.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.
Action by the National City Bank against the Seattle National Bank. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Guie & Halverstadt and Poe & Falknor, all of Seattle, for appellant.
Bausman Oldham, Bullitt & Eggerman, of Seattle, for respondent.
By this action appellant as plaintiff sought a judgment against respondent as defendant, upon a letter of credit issued by a Chicago bank, and from a judgment dismissing the action with prejudice, after a trial on the merits, the plaintiff has appealed.
There is little dispute regarding what we consider the main and governing facts involved, which are substantially as follows On May 20, 1920, the Corn Exchange National Bank of Chicago telegraphed to respondent as follows:
The respondent, as requested, informed the International Trading Company of the receipt of the wire and of its contents. On the same day the Corn Exchange National Bank issued its letter of credit, mailing a copy thereof to respondent enclosed with a letter, the letter of credit and letter of transmission reading as follows:
On May 28, 1920, respondent replied thereto as follows:
The letter of credit called for delivery at Seattle, but its terms were subsequently modified so as to permit the delivery of 85 tons of sugar f. o. b. Seattle, and 70 tons f. o. b. San Francisco. No other change or modification of the terms of the letter of credit was ever made. It is not claimed that there was any communication either oral or written between the litigants here until about July 10, 1920, when, upon the arrival in San Francisco of the sugar to be delivered there, which was the first shipment to arrive, appellant received a telegram from its San Francisco correspondent advising it of the arrival of the sugar there, stating that certain documents with drafts drawn on the National City Bank were being presented, and asked appellant to pay them. This wire was taken by appellant's cashier to an officer of the respondent, who was then requested to wire the Corn Exchange National Bank for authority to make payment for the San Francisco shipment, under the letter of credit hereinbefore set out. This telegram was sent and a reply received refusing to authorize payment for the San Francisco shipment under the letter of credit here involved, for the reason that the documents did not conform to the terms of the letter of credit. This refusal being communicated to defendant, it in turn refusal to make payment of the drafts drawn on it covering the San Francisco shipment, so that all parties refused to accept the documents, or to pay any drafts drawn on account of the San Francisco shipment, on the ground of nonconformity of the documents with the terms of the respective letters of credit. Thereafter the Seattle shipment of 85 tons of sugar arrived, preceded by the documents relating to the same.
About July 21 appellant's cashier again saw an officer of the respondent, showed him the documents accompanying the Seattle shipment, and informed him that the same would be presented with draft for payment on the following day. After the refusal to accept the San Francisco shipment and the failure to secure authority from the Corn Exchange National Bank to pay drafts drawn against its letter of credit in payment for the same, respondent's officers advised appellant's officers that any drafts drawn against the Seattle shipment would not be paid by respondent without telegraphic advices from the Corn Exchange National Bank authorizing such payment. This authority being refused, respondent declined to pay the drafts, and, after some attempt to induce the Corn Exchange National Bank to recede from its position, this action was begun.
The letter of credit, which is the basis of this action authorizes the payment of drafts for standard white granulated...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank
...C. Mass. 1923); Bank of Italy v. Merchants' National Bank, 236 N. Y. 106, 140 N. E. 211 (1923); National City Bank v. Seattle National Bank, 121 Wash. 476, 209 P. 705, 30 A. L. R. 347 (1922). Moreover, if the documents are in proper order, the bank of issue ordinarily may honor the drafts a......
-
Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.
...Banking Corp. v. Irving National Bank (D. C.) 274 Fed. 122, affirmed in (C. C. A.) 283 Fed. 103;National City Bank v. Seattle National Bank, 121 Wash. 476, 209 Pac. 705. [19] The letter of credit also required that there be bills of lading ‘showing Argentine government export license.’ Conf......
-
Maurice O'Meara Co. v. Nat'l Park Bank of New York
...See Commercial Letters of Credit, 35 Harvard Law Review, 730, 734, 735, and authorities there cited; National City Bank v. Seattle Nat. Bank, 121 Wash. 476, 209 P. 705, 30 A. L. R. 347;Bank of Plant City v. Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank (C. C. A.) 270 F. 477;International Banking Co......
-
Camp v. Corn Exch. Nat. Bank
...v. Recknagel, 109 N. Y. 482, 17 N. E. 217; Lamborn v. Lake Shore Banking & Trust Co., supra; National City Bank v. Seattle National Bank, 121 Wash. 476, 209 P. 705, 30 A. L. R. 347. This doctrine would set up the performance of the contract between the customer of the bank and a third party......