National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton, Record No. 1704-98-4.

Citation28 Va. App. 650,507 S.E.2d 667
Decision Date15 December 1998
Docket NumberRecord No. 1704-98-4.
PartiesNATIONAL FRUIT PRODUCT COMPANY, INC. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Brenda STATON.
CourtVirginia Court of Appeals

(J. David Griffin; Fowler, Griffin, Coyne & Coyne, on brief), Winchester, for appellants.

(Nikolas E. Parthemos; Parthemos & Bryant, on brief), Winchester, for appellee.

Present: BENTON, COLEMAN and WILLIS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

National Fruit Product Company and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as "employer") contend the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Brenda Staton proved by clear and convincing evidence that her carpal tunnel syndrome constituted a compensable ordinary disease of life pursuant to Code § 65.2-401. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. See Rule 5A:27.

I.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va.App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). So viewed, the evidence proved that Staton worked for the employer as a caser and label machine operator. In that job, she pulled racks out of the label machine, lowered the racks, loaded the racks with labels, and restarted the machine. She also opened cardboard boxes, folded the flaps of the boxes, placed labels on the boxes, and then put the boxes on a caser. She processed 4,000 to 5,000 such boxes during her daily eight-hour shift, using her left hand more than her right hand. Staton estimated that she processed approximately 550 such boxes per hour, or eight to ten per minute. She performed these tasks for the last twelve of her eighteen years while working for the employer.

On September 4, 1997, after Staton had been working for approximately two hours and as she was folding flaps on a box, she experienced a "bad pain" in her left hand. She could not straighten her left hand and she felt pain throughout her hand. After Staton reported this incident to her supervisor, she left work and reported to a physician to whom her employer referred her.

The following day, Staton began treatment with Dr. Bernard M. Swope, an orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Swope diagnosed Staton as suffering from "[p]robable carpal tunnel syndrome, bilaterally, left greater than right." Dr. Swope later opined that "[b]ased on the number of years that [Staton] has worked at that job and the repetitive nature of the job, and her recent difficulties on the job, I think that there is a high probability that the carpal tunnel is a result of her work environment." Dr. Swope performed surgery on Staton's left hand and arm.

Staton testified that she did not perform any activities outside of her employment that involved the repetitive use of her hands. In addition, prior to September 4, 1997, Staton had never experienced numbness or pain in either hand while performing activities outside of her work.

In ruling that Staton's bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was a compensable ordinary disease of life pursuant to Code § 65.2-401, the commission found as follows:

In the absence of any contrary medical evidence, we are left solely with Dr. Swope's opinion. Section 65.2-401 requires the elements be established by "clear and convincing evidence, (not a mere probability)" (emphasis added). Dr. Swope's opinion is more than a mere probability. It is a high probability, which we find here is clear and convincing evidence.
II.

"`Whether a disease is causally related to the employment and not causally related to other factors is ... a finding of fact.' When there is credible...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Ogden Aviation Services v. Saghy
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • April 4, 2000
    ...must be "established by clear and convincing evidence, (not a mere probability)."3 See also National Fruit Prod. Co. v. Staton, 28 Va. App. 650, 654, 507 S.E.2d 667, 669 (1998) (per curiam) (affirming the commission's award of benefits for carpal tunnel syndrome under 1997 amendments), aff'......
  • Steadman v. Liberty Fabrics, Inc., Record No. 0621-03-3.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 2003
    ...is required beyond a reasonable doubt as in criminal cases. It does not mean clear and unequivocal." National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton, 28 Va.App. 650, 654, 507 S.E.2d 667, 669 (1998) (quoting Fred C. Walker Agency v. Lucas, 215 Va. 535, 540-41, 211 S.E.2d 88, 92 (1975)),aff'd, 259 Va. 2......
  • Lanning v. Virginia Dept. of Transp.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 2002
    ...is required beyond a reasonable doubt as in criminal cases. It does not mean clear and unequivocal." National Fruit Prod. Co. v. Staton, 28 Va. App. 650, 654, 507 S.E.2d 667, 669 (1998) (quoting Fred C. Walker Agency, Inc. v. Lucas, 215 Va. 535, 540-41, 211 S.E.2d 88, 92 (1975)) (emphasis i......
  • Great Eastern Resort Corp. v. Gordon
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • February 29, 2000
    ...are not occupational diseases but are ordinary diseases of life as defined in [Code] § 65.2-401.'" National Fruit Prod. Co. v. Staton, 28 Va.App. 650, 654, 507 S.E.2d 667, 669 (1998). For an ordinary disease of life to be compensable, a claimant must prove by "clear and convincing evidence,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT