National Graphics Co. v. Dilley
| Citation | 681 P.2d 546 |
| Decision Date | 12 April 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 83CA0523,83CA0523 |
| Parties | NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon DILLEY, Defendant-Appellee. . II |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Sherman & Howard, Edward W. Nottingham, Mary J. Kelly, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.
Holm & Christensen, Jon L. Holm, Steven A. Christensen, Denver, for defendant-appellee.
National Graphics Company appeals the order of the trial court dismissing its complaint against defendant, Sharon Dilley, for breach of fiduciary duty, unlawful interference with National's business, breach of covenant not to compete, punitive damages, and injunctive relief. We affirm.
National's claims against Dilley arise out of Dilley's alleged breach of an employment agreement which contained the following noncompetition clause:
"In the event the employment of employee by employer is terminated for any reason whatsoever, employee covenants and agrees that she will not in any manner whatsoever, directly or indirectly, solicit any accounts that were obtained (through the efforts of employee, employer, or any other person) during her employment with National Graphics Company."
Citing § 8-2-113, C.R.S., the trial court ruled the agreement to be void because it was silent as to both time and geographic limitation and thus unreasonable. Section 8-2-113(2) provides:
"(2) Any covenant not to compete which restricts the right of any person to receive compensation for performance of skilled or unskilled labor for any employer shall be void, but this subsection (2) shall not apply to:
(a) Any contract for the purchase and sale of a business or the assets of a business;
(b) Any contract for the protection of trade secrets;
(c) Any contractual provision providing for recovery of the expense of educating and training an employee who has served an employer for a period of less than two years;
(d) Executive and management personnel and officers and employees who constitute professional staff to executive and management personnel."
National concedes that the agreement is silent as to duration and geographic scope. However, it contends that the clause is reasonable because it is limited in terms of customer accounts acquired by plaintiff during the term of Dilley's employment. National further asserts that § 8-2-113(2), C.R.S., does not require limitation in terms of duration and geographic scope, but, even if there is such a requirement, the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reform the agreement to supply the missing limitations.
Prior to the passage of § 8-2-113(2), C.R.S., governing such covenants, the rule was that, to be valid and enforceable, a covenant not to compete must be reasonable both in terms of duration and geographic scope. Gibson v. Angros, 30 Colo.App. 95, 491 P.2d 87 (1971). Review of the legislative history of § 8-2-113, C.R.S., reveals recognition of this rule of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Reed Mill & Lumber Co., Inc. v. Jensen
...to compete is statutorily permitted, it is enforceable only if it is reasonable in duration and geographic scope. Nat'l Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546 (Colo.App.1984); Colo. Accounting Machs., Inc. v. Mergenthaler, 44 Colo.App. 155, 609 P.2d 1125 (1980). To be reasonable, a noncompete......
-
Vaske v. DuCharme, McMillen & Associates, Inc.
...Miller, 762 P.2d 763, 765 (Colo.App.1988); Porter Indus., Inc. v. Higgins, 680 P.2d 1339, 1342 (Colo.App.1984); National Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546, 547 (Colo.App.1984); Colorado Accounting Machs., Inc. v. Mergenthaler, 609 P.2d 1125, 1126 (Colo.App.1980); see also Dresser Indus.,......
-
Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. SFR, Inc.
...law to require a rule of reasonableness with regard to the temporal and geographic scope of the covenant. See National Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546 (Colo.App.1984). We are satisfied that the covenant has not been shown to be unreasonable or invalid and we thus hold it is enforceable......
-
Warming Trends LLC v. Stone
...P.2d 546, 546-47 (Colo.App. 1984).[16] Additionally, non-compete agreements must be reasonable as to both duration and geographic scope. Id. at 547; Nutting v. RAM Southwest, 106 F.Supp.2d 1121, 1127 (D. Colo. 2000); Energex Enterprises, Inc. v. Anthony Doors, Inc., 250 F.Supp.2d 1278, 1283......
-
Colorado. Practice Text
...2d 1247, 1253 (D. Colo. 2001). 66. Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuay, 937 P.2d 907, 910 (Colo. App. 1997). 67. Nat’l Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546, 547 (Colo. App. 1984). 68. Id. at 547. 69. Gold Messenger, Inc. , 937 P.2d at 910–11. 70. Reed Mill & Lumber Co. , 165 P.3d at 734. 71. Atm......
-
Colorado
...2d 1247, 1253 (D. Colo. 2001). 59. Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuay, 937 P.2d 907, 910 (Colo. App. 1997). 60. Nat’l Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546, 547 (Colo. App. 1984). 61. Id. at 547. 62. Gold Messenger, Inc. , 937 P.2d at 910-11. 63. Reed Mill & Lumber Co. , 165 P.3d at 734. 64. Atm......
-
Chapter 19 - § 19.2 • NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS
...the intent of the legislature was to preserve the rule that noncompetition agreements must be reasonable. Nat'l Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546, 547 (Colo. App. 1984). The statute has been found to apply to covenants made by independent contractors as well as covenants made by employee......
-
Chapter 19 - § 19.2 • NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS
...the intent of the legislature was to preserve the rule that noncompetition agreements must be reasonable. Nat'l Graphics Co. v. Dilley, 681 P.2d 546, 547 (Colo. App. 1984). The statute has been found to apply to covenants made by independent contractors as well as covenants made by employee......