National Labor Relations Board v. National Tool Co., 9567.
Decision Date | 16 December 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 9567.,9567. |
Citation | 139 F.2d 490 |
Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. NATIONAL TOOL CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
S. J. Kornhauser and Horan & Bell, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel. On consideration whereof, the motion of the respondent to dismiss the petition is denied. It is not the function of this court to inquire into the propriety of expenditures by the National Labor Relations Board of funds appropriated to its use by the Congress.
And it appearing that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence, it is ordered that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be, and the same is hereby, enforced.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
SH Camp & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
...being filed." National Labor Relations Board v. Elvine Knitting Mills, 2 Cir., 138 F.2d 633, 634. In National Labor Relations Board v. National Tool Co., 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 490, this court said: "It is not the function of this court to inquire into the propriety of expenditures by the Nationa......
- National Labor Relations Board v. CENTRAL STEEL T. CO., 12651.