National Parents' Resource Institute for Drug Educ., Inc. v. Peachtree Hotel Co.

Decision Date24 October 1991
Docket NumberNo. A91A1403,A91A1403
Citation201 Ga.App. 637,411 S.E.2d 884
PartiesNATIONAL PARENTS' RESOURCE INSTITUTE FOR DRUG EDUCATION, INC. v. PEACHTREE HOTEL COMPANY.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Trotter, Smith & Jacobs, Sylvia K. Kochler, Scott K. Tippett, Atlanta, for appellant.

Stokes, Lazarus & Carmichael, Michael W. Lord, Atlanta, for appellee.

BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge.

The National Parents' Resource Institute for Drug Education, Inc. ("PRIDE") appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the Peachtree Hotel Company ("the hotel") in the hotel's suit on an account under a contract for rooms provided during PRIDE's national conference in Atlanta. PRIDE alleges that the trial court erred by granting the hotel's motion for summary judgment because it was not a party to any contract with the hotel and because an arbitration clause in the contract deprived the trial court of jurisdiction. Held:

1. As PRIDE does not question the amount due or the legal sufficiency of the contract, the only question is whether PRIDE is a party to the contract. PRIDE's contentions that it is not a party to this contract are directly contradicted by the contract with the hotel and letters from and to PRIDE in the record.

The record shows the contract was signed by PRIDE's Associate Director and the contract shows the "group requests master billing for room, tax and planning function." "Where the terms of a written contract are clear and unambiguous, the court will look to the contract alone to find the intention of the parties." Health Service Centers, Inc. v. Boddy, 257 Ga. 378, 380, 359 S.E.2d 659. Accordingly, the contract plainly shows that PRIDE was a party to the contract and we may not consider parol evidence to take from or vary the terms of the contract. Buice Grading, etc., v. Bales, 187 Ga.App. 263, 265, 370 S.E.2d 26.

In any event the record in this case supports fully that PRIDE was obligated under the contract. A letter to the hotel from PRIDE's Associate Director advised "this letter is to confirm that [PRIDE] has complete control over housing for the PRIDE Conferences," and requested that she be contacted in the event of problems or questions.

Additionally, the record shows that the manager of conference operations for PRIDE informed the hotel by letter, with a copy to PRIDE's Associate Director, "please find enclosed the signed contract for the PRIDE 1989 housing block." This letter was in reply to the hotel's earlier letter which stated, "enclosed is a contract which outlines my understanding of your guest room requirements. Please review this information and if all meets with your approval, sign both copies of the contract.... Upon receipt of the signed contract, we will then consider all arrangements confirmed and definite." Therefore, PRIDE's argument that the Associate Director merely signed a tentative contract is contrary to the record.

Based upon the evidence of record, PRIDE was a party to the contract, and as PRIDE has never disputed the amount owed or that it was not paid, the trial court did not err by finding that the hotel was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Roswell Properties, Inc. v. Salle
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 19 Marzo 1993
    ...to a third party. These actions waived Roswell Properties' right to seek arbitration. National Parents' Resource Institute for Drug Ed. v. Peachtree Hotel Co., 201 Ga.App. 637, 638, 411 S.E.2d 884. "An arbitration clause of a contract may be repudiated, waived, or abandoned, by either or bo......
  • Aaron v. United Health Servs. of Ga., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 15 Marzo 2019
    ...proceedings, the appellant waived its right to insist upon arbitration."); Nat. Parents’ Resource Institute for Drug Education, Inc. v. Peachtree Hotel Co. , 201 Ga. App. 637, 638 (2), 411 S.E.2d 884 (1991).Because the parties mutually assented to the Agreement, and PruittHealth sought to e......
  • JOJO PARTNERS v. Abrams Properties, No. A03A1593.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 8 Julio 2003
    ...judgment without ever moving to compel arbitration or to stay proceedings pending arbitration); Nat. Parents' Resource &c. v. Peachtree Hotel Co., 201 Ga.App. 637, 638(2), 411 S.E.2d 884 (1991) (appellant defended on the merits and litigated case without moving to compel or to stay Weyant v......
  • Odion v. Avesis, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 3 Junio 2014
    ...as a defense in its answer and as the ground for its motion to dismiss. See generally Nat. Parents' Resource Institute for Drug Ed. v. Peachtree Hotel Co., 201 Ga.App. 637, 638(2), 411 S.E.2d 884 (1991) (listing motion to dismiss among actions that defendant could take in response to lawsui......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT