Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. McLaughlin, 14082.

Decision Date17 July 1970
Docket NumberNo. 14082.,14082.
Citation429 F.2d 1317
PartiesNATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. James J. McLAUGHLIN, Patrick McLaughlin, Danny Ray Meador, Harry E. Hoskins, Howard Hoskins, Eva Hoskins, Glenn Arlan Chapman, George Harry Chapman, Joseph R. Dickerson and Charles Edward Hogan, Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Jack A. Mann, and Joseph Luchini, Beckley, W. Va., (Lynch, Mann & Knapp, Beckley, W. Va., on brief) for appellants.

Donald D. Hodson, and Edward M. Payne, III, Beckley, W. Va., (Bowers, File, Hodson & Payne, Beckley, W. Va., on brief) for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The question of permission to drive an automobile and deviation from the scope of permission was submitted to the jury under a fair charge. The jury answered that Danny Ray Meador was driving the vehicle with the permission of the owner under the omnibus clause of the owner's insurance clause.

We think the question was one upon which reasonable men could differ, and was within the province of the jury. It follows, therefore, that the decision of the district judge to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict was erroneous.

Reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Handley v. Union Carbide Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia
    • 17 Octubre 1985
    ...Jeanes v. Milner, 428 F.2d 598, 601 (8th Cir. 1970); Webb v. Harvell, 563 F.Supp. 172, 177 (D.C.Ark.1983). 10 Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin, 429 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir.1970); Simblest v. Maynard, 427 F.2d 1 (2d Cir.1970). 11 This is a significant change brought about by the new statu......
  • Gairola v. Com. of Va. Dept. of General Services
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 6 Febrero 1985
    ...reasonable jurors could have reached." Wheatley v. Gladden, 660 F.2d 1024, 1027 (4th Cir.1981); see also Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. McLaughlin, 429 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir.1970). Unless there is " 'substantial evidence to support' the verdict asked of the jury," the reviewing court must ......
  • Federal Sav. & Loan Ins. Co. v. Williams
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 30 Octubre 1985
    ...people could reach; therefore, the Court will not substitute it's judgment for that of the jury. See Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. McLoughlin, 429 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir. 1970); Neugebauer v. A.S. Abell Co., 474 F.Supp. 1053, 1071 (D.Md.1979). The Court will deny judgment for defendants ba......
  • CSX Transp., Inc. v. Peirce
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • 25 Septiembre 2013
    ...that reasonable jurors could have reached.” Wheatley v. Gladden, 660 F.2d 1024, 1027 (4th Cir.1981) (citing Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin, 429 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir.1970)). This Court notes that the jury was presented with a great deal of evidence during the two-week long trial that s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT