Navarro v. Secret Harbor Farms, Inc., 16265

Decision Date14 February 1974
Docket NumberNo. 16265,16265
PartiesFranklin R. NAVARRO, Appellant, v. SECRET HARBOR FARMS, INC., Appellee. (1st Dist.)
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Marvin O. Teague, Houston, for appellant.

Barrow, Bland, Rehmet & Lee, Gerald T. Drought, Houston, for appellee.

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment based on a verified account granted to plaintiff-appellee, Secret Harbor Farms, Inc., against defendant-appellant, Franklin R. Navarro.

Plaintiff is a foreign corporation operating a private school. It entered into a contract with defendant whereby he agreed, in consideration of the care, education and counseling to be provided his son, to pay to plaintiff $1,100.00 per month plus additional charges for clothing, medicine, dental and medical expenses. Defendant withdrew his child from the school without giving notice as provided by the contract and without paying the monthly tuition and certain additional charges.

Plaintiff filed this suit against defendant alleging breach of contract and in the alternative alleged a debt, supported by an account properly verified in accordance with Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. After the defendant answered, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and an affidavit. The defendant then filed an amended answer alleging a general denial, failure of consideration and unjust enrichment and that he was induced to enter the contract by false and fraudulent misrepresentations of fact. There was also an allegation denying that defendant owed plaintiff the sum of $4,747.34. The defendant signed the pleading. Below his signature appears this affidavit:

'State of Texas

County of Harris

'Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Franklin R. Navarro, known to me to be the person whose name appears hereon, and stated to me that he is the defendant in this cause and that he has read the foregoing Defendant's Original Answer and that the matters and facts contained therein are true and correct.

'Sworn to and subscribed to before me, on this the 21st day of February, A.D. 1973.

/s/ Pamela Ann Borgh

Notary Public in and for

Harris County, Texas'

From a consideration of the entire instrument we conclude that Franklin R. Navarro stated under oath that the matters and facts contained in Defendant's First Amended Original Answer are true and correct. However the Answer is not sufficient to constitute a written denial under oath contemplated by Rule 185, T.R.C.P. The instrument contains only a sworn general denial. Jorrie Furniture Co. v. Rohm, 442 S.W.2d 476 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1969).

The defendant did not file an answer to the motion for summary judgment or affidavits in opposition thereto.

The affidavit filed by the plaintiff incorporated the contract by reference, and a copy was attached thereto. To affiant stated that he signed the contract and saw it signed by Franklin R. Navarro. He stated that pursuant to the agreement defendant's son was admitted as a student at the rates stipulated in the agreement. There was attached to and incorporated in the affidavit a copy of an accounting ledger sheet 'setting out the charges and credits entered pursuant to said enrollment agreement.' There is a statement that the charges reflected by the exhibit were made for services actually rendered by Secret Harbor Farms, Inc. at the request of Franklin R. Navarro and that they are fair and reasonable charges for the same or similar services in the vicinty of Anacortes, Washington. He states that there is due and owing to the corporation...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State ex rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power Agency
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 2 March 1978
    ...n. r. e.); Wiseman v. Horn, 309 S.W.2d 253 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston 1958, no writ history); Navarro v. Secret Harbor Farms, 506 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (1st Dist.) 1974, writ ref'd n. r. e.). The principal points raised by appellants are (1) whether the statute authorizing the formati......
  • Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. Patterson & Lamberty, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 31 July 1975
    ...900 (Tex.1964). See also Phil Phillips Ford, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co ., 465 S.W.2d 933 (Tex.1971); Navarro v. Secret Harbor Farms, Inc., 506 S.W.2d 337 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston (1st Dist.) 1974, writ ref'd n The record before us conclusively shows that the Coughlin judgmen......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT