O'Neal v. State.

Decision Date07 February 1906
Citation92 S.W. 417
PartiesO'NEAL v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Grayson County Court; G. P. Webb, Judge.

Horace O'Neal was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals. Reversed.

Howard Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROOKS, J.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, fined $75 and 50 days in jail.

Prosecuting witness, Everett Fairless, testified that he had been in the employ of Sam Rich (constable) as a spotter for local option violations; that about December 21, 1904, he, together with H. S. Rich, Pete Hasey, Joe Goode, and Munger were in Denison, Grayson county; that, while there, he went into Mike Sweeney's cold storage; that appellant was there behind the bar at the end of the bar near the door. At the other end of the bar was a negro porter, also behind the bar; that witness called on the negro for some "tea," and witness and Pete Hasey went back into the rear of the building, into a domino room; that the negro porter soon brought him two half-pints of whisky, wrapped up in a paper, and the witness paid the porter therefor; that he did not remember telling Sam Rich that witness bought this whisky from appellant; that he had been in Sweeney's place of busines several times theretofore; that while in Denison, after the transaction here detailed, Pete Hasey brought this witness a paper to sign, to the effect that he had not purchased any whisky from defendant, which witness signed and swore to before a notary public; that some time thereafter Pete Hasey handed witness $10 and said, "Here is a present for you;" that witness did not know where Pete Hasey got this money. Witness further stated that he did not purchase this whisky from appellant; that he had no conversation or transaction with appellant. Pete Hasey testified, substantially as did witness Fairless, and states he gave Fairless $10, and the money was handed him to be given to Fairless by a man he did not know. Sam Rich, the constable, swore that Fairless and Hasey told him that they bought whisky from appellant. Joe Goode testified that said prosecuting witnesses told him that the whisky was purchased from appellant. Fred Munger testified, that he was deputy sheriff of Grayson county, and was in Mike Sweeney's place of business the night that Fairless got the whisky; that he was standing back by the stove near the rear end of the bar, where the negro porter referred to above, was standing. Fairless had a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 28 Mayo 2008
    ...137 S.W.3d 75 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004); see, e.g., Threadgill v. State, 146 S.W.3d 654, 664 (Tex.Crim.App.2004); O'Neal v. State, 49 Tex.Crim. 297, 298, 92 S.W. 417, 417 (1906); Kunde v. State, 22 Tex.App. 65, 69, 3 S.W. 325, 331 (1886). "Evidence as to the identity of a" criminal "may be prove......
  • Heffnarn v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 3 Diciembre 1924
    ...164, subd. 8; also, Floyd v. State, 29 Tex. App. 356, 16 S. W. 188; Largin v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 574, 40 S. W. 280; O'Neal v. State, 49 Tex. Cr. R. 297, 92 S. W. 417; Brown v. State, 55 Tex. Cr. R. 9, 114 S. W. 820; Thompson v. State, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 408, 123 S. W. 593; Layton v. State, 6......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT