O'Neal v. The Grand Lodge of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
Decision Date | 27 February 1924 |
Parties | MARGARET H. O'NEAL, CURATOR, Respondent, v. THE GRAND LODGE OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, et al., Appellants |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Greene County.--Hon. Guy D. Kirby Judge.
AFFIRMED (in part) and REVERSED (in part).
John T Sturgis and Frank B. Williams for appellant.
G. G Lydy for respondent.
This is a suit brought upon a certificate of insurance issued by the defendant Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. The amount agreed to be paid in case of the death of John C. Smithmier was $ 1200. The plaintiff made the individuals Halls, Crain, Kerns, Banks and McBride defendants on the theory that the association or organization was a partnership and that they were responsible and individually liable for the payment of the loss sustained under this policy. A judgment was rendered by the trial court for the full amount of the policy with interest, from which all of the defendants appealed.
The trial court made the following finding of facts:
The first 16 paragraphs of which were made at the suggestion and request of the defendants, and the 17th at the court's own motion, to which the defendants excepted. An additional fact which we may state is that the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen provides for a regular assessment on all its members and a fixed amount in monthly payments to those holding insurance certificates, creating what is termed a Beneficiary Fund, out of which fund death claims shall be paid.
The appellants have practically abandoned two points made in the original brief, one going to the party plaintiff and the other that a suit in equity might be brought to cancel a policy obtained by fraud notwithstanding the death of the assured. The attorneys for appellants admit that the Supreme Court has ruled against them on these two points.
The principal contention now being made is that under the Constitution of the defendant it had no power to issue the benefit certificate to applicants over the age of 45; that the Constitution limited the officers of the Grand Lodge, or any one for it, and prohibited them from issuing a policy for one who had attained a greater age. The other point goes to the liability of individual defendants who were merely members of the order.
It was admitted that defendant F. M. Hall is a delegate and Member of the Grand Lodge and has been a member of the order for 28 years; that Paul Banks is Secretary of the Local Lodge and has been a member of the order for 10 years; that J. P. Kerns is Treasurer of the Local Lodge and has been a member of the order for 22 years; that J. H. Crain was Financier of the Local Lodge at the time the policy was issued; that Charles H. McBride is a member of the Local Lodge, was Treasurer, and has been a member for 20 years; and that Local D. H. Nichols Lodge, No. 167, is one of the Subordinate Lodges connected with the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. It is shown that J. H. Crain's signature was attached to the Certificate merely as certifying the acceptance of the insurance Certificate by Smithmier.
In support of the contention made by appellants that the defendant, the Grand Lodge of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial