Nealy v. City of West Palm Beach
| Decision Date | 09 July 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. BI-365,BI-365 |
| Citation | 491 So.2d 585,11 Fla. L. Weekly 1502 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1502 Lanoris NEALY, Appellant, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH and Crawford & Company, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Timothy H. Kenney of Timothy H. Kenney, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Marta M. Suarez-Murias of James W. Vance, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
In this workers' compensation appeal, claimant challenges the deputy commissioner's order denying his claim for a diagnostic test. We reverse.
Claimant injured his lower back in a compensable accident on July 31, 1979. On January 6, 1985, he re-injured the same area of his back in a noncompensable automobile accident. Claimant had been receiving treatment for his industrial injury by Dr. Wilson, a neurologist, since May 19, 1982, and continued to receive treatment following the automobile accident. Dr. Wilson testified that aside from complaints of increased pain, claimant's complaints after the accident were essentially the same as they were before. Claimant, on the other hand, maintained that his back pain was intensifying prior to the accident.
Approximately two months after the second accident, Dr. Wilson suggested that claimant undergo a CAT scan of his lumbar spine to determine whether there had been any alteration in his bulging disc as identified in his last evaluation in 1982. The doctor later suggested that the CAT scan be supplanted by an MRI or NMR test because of its diagnostic superiority. He advised the employer/carrier by letter that he was recommending the test "due to an exacerbation of the patient's pain." At deposition, he emphasized that the need for the test was related to the compensable injury, as he was unable to distinguish whether the original accident or the subsequent automobile accident was responsible for claimant's present condition. He explained that he would be better able to make the determination of causation after the test. Dr. Wilson opined that he probably would have administered the test in the future even absent the second accident since claimant had exhibited an abnormality in his myelogram from the beginning.
Despite Dr. Wilson's testimony, the deputy denied the claim for the test. The deputy found that the need for the test was due entirely to claimant's increased complaints of pain following the automobile accident and not due, even in part, to the continuing care of claimant by Dr. Wilson for the compensable injury....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. Chromalloy-Turbocumbustor
...1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Sanchez v. Security Sales Co., 522 So.2d 435, 436 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), quoting Nealy v. City of West Palm Beach, 491 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In much the same vein, the referral of a claimant by an authorized physician to another physician, is compensabl......
-
Prince v. Prince Ins. Services
...it should be determined that the claimant suffered from both compensable and noncompensable conditions. Nealy v. City of West Palm Beach, 491 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). See also Perry v. Ridgecrest International, 548 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Green Chromalloy-Turbocumbustor, 5......
-
Arnau v. Stores
...injured workers' symptoms—even if the tests prove the symptoms are unrelated to the compensable injury. See Nealy v. City of W. Palm Beach, 491 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); see also Superior Concrete Constr. v. Olsen, 616 So.2d 183, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Perry v. RidgecrestInt'l, ......
-
Sumner v. Gardinier, Inc.
...test is compensable." Sanchez v. Security Sales Co., 522 So.2d 435, 436 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (quoting Nealy v. City of West Palm Beach, 491 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ). In the case of Copeland Steel Erectors v. Miles, 483 So.2d 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), this court held that a claiman......