Neary v. State
Decision Date | 08 January 1985 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 443 |
Citation | 469 So.2d 1321 |
Parties | John Charles NEARY v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
J. Wilson Dinsmore, Birmingham, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and J. Anthony McLain and James F. Hampton, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
John Charles Neary was indicted and convicted under a three-count indictment charging trafficking in cannabis and cocaine and the possession of various controlled substances. Alabama Code 1975, §§ 20-2-80(1), (2) and § 20-2-70(a). The sentences for the trafficking convictions were 25 years' imprisonment and a $25,000.00 fine and 25 years' imprisonment and a $50,000.00 fine. The sentence for the possession conviction was 15 years' imprisonment and a $20,000.00 fine.
These convictions must be reversed because the trial judge erroneously charged the jury that Neary had a prior conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude.
At trial, on cross examination by the prosecution, Neary testified, without objection, that in 1976 in New York he pled guilty to a misdemeanor for possession of marijuana and was sentenced to three years' probation and received a $3,000.00 fine.
In instructing the jury, the trial judge stated:
Proper and timely objection was made to this portion of the oral charge.
A conviction for an offense involving moral turpitude can affect a defendant's credibility and the weight the jury is to give his testimony. Johnson v. State, 292 Ala. 208, 210, 291 So.2d 336 (1974); Alabama Code 1975, § 12-21-162. "[A] defendant himself may be examined only as to his prior convictions of crimes involving moral turpitude." Peyton v. State, 40 Ala.App. 556, 565, 120 So.2d 415 (1959), cert. denied, 270 Ala. 740, 120 So.2d 429, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 870, 81 S.Ct. 114, 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960). "In cross-examining a witness for the purpose of impeaching him by showing the commission of a crime involving moral turpitude, care should be exercised so as not to include an offense that does not involve moral turpitude." Kennedy v. State, 371 So.2d 464, 468 (Ala.Cr.App.1979).
The misdemeanor and felony offenses of possession of marijuana are not crimes involving moral turpitude. Ex parte McIntosh, 443 So.2d 1283 (Ala.1983); Luker v. State, 361 So.2d 1124 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. dismissed, 361 So.2d 1127 (Ala.1978). Consequently, the defendant should not have been cross examined about his prior convictions for possession of marijuana and the jury should not have been instructed that such convictions involved moral turpitude and affected the defendant's credibility. The giving of the erroneous instructions constitutes reversible error. United States v. Poole, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chapman v. Gooden
...or facilitating escape) (McGovern v. State, 44 Ala.App. 197, 205 So.2d 247 (1967)), mere possession of marijuana (Neary v. State, 469 So.2d 1321 (Ala.Crim.App.1985)), and driving under the influence (Finley v. State, 661 So.2d 762 (Ala.Crim.App. 1995)) have all been held to be crimes that d......
-
Jones v. State
...possession of marijuana is not a crime involving moral turpitude. Wilson v. State, 520 So.2d 205 (Ala.Cr.App.1987); Neary v. State, 469 So.2d 1321 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). After the prosecutor's questions, the trial court instructed the jury as "The objection is overruled. And, ladies and gentlem......
-
Wilson v. State, 8 Div. 653
...of marijuana because that crime does not involve moral turpitude. Ex parte McIntosh, 443 So.2d 1283 (Ala.1983); Neary v. State, 469 So.2d 1321 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). That error was not Early on the morning of November 22, 1984, Florence Police Officer Berry Wayne Curtis and his partner stopped ......