Nelsen v. Rampone

Decision Date03 March 1969
Citation31 A.D.2d 933,299 N.Y.S.2d 18
PartiesLillian NELSEN et al., Appellants, v. Charles R. RAMPONE et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Boylan & Berger, Port Jefferson, for defendants-respondents.

Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and BENJAMIN, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and KLEINFELD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel, slander and expenses for medical care, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 4, 1967 after a nonjury trial, upon the trial court's dismissal of the complaint and its award of $1,525 against plaintiffs on the counterclaim.

Appeal dismissed, with costs, unless appellants file and serve a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of the order hereon.

The appendix submitted on this appeal is patently insufficient for the purpose of passing on the contentions raised in appellants' brief. The trial produced at least 560 pages of transcript of which the appendix contains merely a few pages of testimony (see E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N.Y.2d 51, 268 N.Y.S.2d 51, 215 N.E.2d 339; Melville v. Melville, 29 A.D.2d 679, 286 N.Y.S.2d 892; Pollack v. Pollack, 25 A.D.2d 756, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957; CPLR 5528).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nelsen v. Rampone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 14, 1969
    ...the appeal unless the appellants would file and serve a proper appendix within 30 days after entry of that order (Nelsen v. Rampone, 31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18). Appellants have submitted a supplemental appendix which is patently insufficient to determine the issues raised. The appendix......
  • Wexler v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 20, 1969
    ...of which the appendix contains three pages of testimony (Lo Gerfo v. Lo Gerfo, 30 A.D.2d 156, 290 N.Y.S.2d 1005; Nelsen v. Rampone, 31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18; see E. P. Reynolds, Inc. v. Nager Elec. Co., 17 N.Y.2d 51, 268 N.Y.S.2d 15, 215 N.E.2d 339; Melville v. Melville, 29 A.D.2d 679......
  • Harbor Associates, Inc. v. Asheroff
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 8, 1969
    ...Estates Civic Association, 20 A.D.2d 654, 246 N.Y.S.2d 241; Guarnacci v. Ferguson, 29 A.D.2d 839, 287 N.Y.S.2d 471; Nelsen v. Rampone, 31 A.D.2d 933, 299 N.Y.S.2d 18). ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT