Nelson v. Nelson
| Decision Date | 12 November 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-3947.,97-3947. |
| Citation | 721 So.2d 388 |
| Parties | Christopher NELSON, Appellant, v. Gloria NELSON, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jeffrey Begens, Plantation, for appellant.
C. Lina Kell, Pompano Beach, for appellee.
This appeal results from a dissolution of marriage granted November 7, 1997. We affirm the amended final judgment of dissolution in all respects. We write to address three of the former husband's points on appeal which concern the award of permanent alimony, the invalidation of the parties' antenuptial agreement, and the valuation of certain marital assets.
The parties were married twelve and one-half years. This marriage falls within the "gray area" between short-term and long-term marriages, where there is no presumption in favor of or against an award of permanent alimony. Burrill v. Burrill, 701 So.2d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In these marriages, a disparate earning capacity becomes a "significant factor" in deciding whether permanent or temporary support is appropriate. Zeigler v. Zeigler, 635 So.2d 50, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Here, the trial court found the former husband earns over $72,000 annually, and imputed an annual income of $12,000 to the former wife. The trial court examined each of the economic factors contained in section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes (1995). Based on its findings, the court determined the wife was in need of permanent periodic alimony and the husband possessed the ability to pay. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding permanent periodic alimony in this case.
The second point we address is the trial court's invalidation of the antenuptial agreement. The antenuptial agreement was dictated by the husband and written by the wife on the day before the parties' wedding when the wife was one month pregnant. The former husband argues the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in invalidating the agreement, because the court made no express findings regarding its legal basis for invalidating the agreement. See Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987). Our review of the record reveals the evidence on this issue was largely undisputed. Thus, we conclude the trial court's failure to set forth specific findings was harmless.
Finally, the husband alleges error in the trial court's valuation of certain assets, contending the record lacks competent substantial evidence to support the court's valuation. We take this opportunity...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Alpha v. Alpha
...and homemaking. 9. § 61.075(1) and (8), Fla. Stat. 10. See Martinez v. Martinez, 761 So.2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Lynch v. Lynch, 695 So.2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Parker v. Parker, 655 So.2d 233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). See also Abrams, I F......
-
Escudero v. Escudero, 98-1833.
...that based on his conduct in the second marriage, the old saying of you reap what you sow is appropriate here. 9. See Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (12½ year marriage); Segall v. Segall, 708 So.2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (8 year marriage); Young v. Young, 677 So.2d 130......
-
Johnson v. Johnson
...2d DCA 2002) (twelve-year marriage); Krafchuk v. Krafchuk, 804 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (twelve-year marriage); Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (12½ year marriage); Young v. Young, 677 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (15 year marriage); Gregoire v. Gregoire, 615 So.2......
-
Yitzhari v. Yitzhari
...factor in deciding whether permanent or temporary alimony is appropriate, a factor not considered below. See Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So.2d 388, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(in gray area marriages, "a disparate earning capacity becomes a `significant factor' in deciding whether permanent or tempora......
-
Equitable distribution and property issues
...marital assets and existence and balances due of marital debts in order for court to include them in final judgment); Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (court is only required to value significant assets of parties; where parties fail to present evidence as to value of as......
-
An update on Florida alimony case law: are alimony guidelines a part of our future? .
...43 $1000 net Moorehead per month 745 So. 2d 549 imputed (Fla. 4th DCA by trial 1999) court Nelson v. 12 years $12,000 per Nelson year 721 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) McHugh v. less than 0 McHugh 14 years 702 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) Cerra v. Cerra 24 years late 40s $5,000 820 So. 2......
-
Alimony and support
...earning capacity becomes a significant factor in deciding whether permanent or rehabilitative alimony is appropriate. [ Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Williams v. Williams, 686 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (affirmed $1,500 for three years as bridge-the-gap rehabilit......
-
Probable problematic pitfalls in preparing prenuptial agreements.
...(Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1976) (PA invalid where husband sprung it on wife demanding she execute it within 24 hours of wedding); Nelson v. Nelson, 721 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1998) (PA prepared on the day before the wedding held (13) See FLA. STAT. [subsections] 732.701 and 732.502. (14) Felicia......