Nemchyonok v. Peng Liu Ying
| Decision Date | 01 December 2003 |
| Docket Number | 2003-00464. |
| Citation | 767 N.Y.S.2d 811,2003 NY Slip Op 19152,2 A.D.3d 421 |
| Parties | ALEXANDER NEMCHYONOK, Respondent, v. PENG LIU YING, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 [1992]; Rainey v Smith, 300 AD2d 383 [2002]; Duldulao v City of New York, 284 AD2d 296 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit medical proof in admissible form that was contemporaneous with the accident showing any initial range of motion restrictions in his spine (see Ifrach v Neiman, 306 AD2d 380 [2003]; Pajda v Pedone, 303 AD2d 729 [2003]; Lanza v Carlick, 279 AD2d 613, 614 [2001]; Passarelle v Burger, 278 AD2d 294 [2000]). Furthermore, the affirmation of the plaintiff's examining physician did not provide any explanation for the significant gap between the plaintiff's initial treatment and his subsequent visit to the examining physician (see Francis v Christopher, 302 AD2d 425 [2003]; Dimenshteyn v Caruso, 262 AD2d 348 [1999]; Perez v Velez, 253 AD2d 865 [1998]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sant v. Iglesias
...are inadmissible and further do not present objective qualitative evidence of plaintiff's alleged restrictions (see Nemchyonok v Ying, 2 A.D.3d 421, 767 N.Y.S.2d 811 [2d Dept 2003]); Pajda v Pedone, 303 A.D.2d 729, 757 N.Y.S.2d 452 [2d Dept 2003]); Jimenez v Kambli, 272 A.D.2d 581, 708 N.Y.......
-
Spence v. Mikelberg, 2008 NY Slip Op 33332(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11/17/2008)
...of motion. See Ranzie v Abdul-Massih, 28 A.D.3d 447 (2nd Dept. 2006); Yeung v Rojas, 18 A.D.3d 863 (2nd Dept. 2005); Nemchyonok v Ying, 2 A.D.3d 421 (2nd Dept. 2003). Lastly, notwithstanding plaintiff's contentions to the contrary, plaintiff has failed to submit competent medical evidence t......
-
Giannetta v. Mohammed
...of motion. See Ranzie v Abdul-Massih. 28 A.D.3d 447 (2nd Dept. 2006); Yeung v Roias. 18 A.D.3d 863 (2nd Dept. 2005); Nemchyonok v Ying. 2 A.D.3d 421 (2nd Dept. 2003). Accordingly. the motion by defendants Fellah Mohammed and Finnigan Cab Corp.. for summary judgment on the threshold issue is......
-
Cruz v. Romero, 2008 NY Slip Op 30515(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2/19/2008)
...of motion. See Ranzie v Abdul-Massih, 28 A.D.3d 447 [2nd Dept. 2006]; Yeung v Rojas, 18 A.D.3d 863 [2nd Dept. 2005]; Nemchyonok v Ying, 2 A.D.3d 421 [2nd Dept. 2003]. In the absence of any admissible objective evidence of injury, plaintiffs self-serving affidavit is likewise insufficient to......