Nettz v. Phillips
Decision Date | 12 February 1962 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 4-1066. |
Citation | 202 F. Supp. 270 |
Parties | Frances Ann NETTZ, Executrix of the Estate of H. L. Nettz, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. V. Lee PHILLIPS, District Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Iowa |
John H. Raife, Des Moines (of Dickinson, Throckmorton, Parker, Mannheimer & Raife), and J. R. Larson, Atlantic, Iowa, for plaintiff.
Donald A. Wine, U. S. Atty., Des Moines, Iowa, and John T. Piper, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant.
This matter came on for hearing after the parties hereto filed stipulations of facts herein followed by motions for summary judgment on behalf of each. The facts are not in dispute. The issue before the court involves a determination of whether property passing from decedent to surviving spouse by will qualified for the marital deduction permitted under the Federal Estate Tax laws. (Section 812(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, Section 93(a) of the Technical Amendments Act of 1958).
H. L. Nettz died April 16, 1954, leaving as his will an instrument entitled "Joint and Reciprocal Last Will and Testament of H. L. Nettz and Frances Ann Nettz," which was probated in Cass County, Iowa. His surviving spouse, Frances Ann Nettz, was appointed executrix of his estate. She filed a federal estate tax return showing no tax due. Upon audit the government assessed a deficiency of $2,328.58 plus interest thereon of $271.29 which plaintiff paid and now seeks to recover. The tax in dispute was computed on property of a value in excess of $25,204.12 which the government contends does not qualify for the marital deduction. Said property passed from decedent to his wife under the provisions of his will.
The court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of this action by virtue of Title 28, Section 1340.
The relevant portions of decedent's will are as follows:
The government contends the marital deduction is not available to the Estate of decedent because the surviving spouse received only a terminable interest in his property. The plaintiff contends the interest passing to the spouse by the will qualified under Section 812(e) (1) (F), Internal Revenue Code of 1939 Section 93(a) of P.L. 85-866, effective as to estates of decedents dying before August 17, 1954, which is as follows:
Since the will was executed and probated in Iowa the law of Iowa...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burnett v. United States
...that it may be exercisable "during life". See, United States v. Spicer (10th Cir. 1964) 332 F.2d 750, 752, note 3; Nettz v. Phillips (D.C.Iowa 1962) 202 F.Supp. 270, 272. But, whether exercisable "during life" or by testamentary gift, the power must include the right to transfer the propert......
-
Estate of Schildkraut v. CIR
...if the size of the share had been expressed in terms of a definite fraction or percentage. * * * 7 This is also true of Nettz v. Phillips, 202 F.Supp. 270 (S.Iowa 1962), cited to us by 8 Even if the entire $300,000 in the trust were left to the widow, the maximum possible marital deduction ......
-
Salter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Salter)
...the several circuits as to whether a power of testamentary disposition is essential to the allowance of the deduction. Nettz v. Phillips, 202 F.Supp. 270 (S.D. Iowa 1962). Compare, e.g., Tyler v. United States, 468 F.2d 959, 962-963 (C.A. 10, 1972), with Pipe's Estate v. Commissioner, 241 F......
-
United States v. Ford
...of Internal Revenue, 323 F.2d 438, 442 (8 Cir. 1963); Poage v. Phillips, 202 F.Supp. 267, 269 (S.D.Iowa 1961); Nettz v. Phillips, 202 F.Supp. 270, 271 (S.D. Iowa 1961). 3 See, also, Hyland v. Standiford, 253 Iowa 294, 111 N.W.2d 260, 264 (1961). 4 Estate of Gust Marion Peterson, 23 T.C. 102......