New York Life Ins. Co. v. Smith
Decision Date | 03 May 1897 |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Parties | NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. v. SMITH. |
Appeal from district court, Tarrant county; S. P. Greene, Judge.
Action brought by Nannie E. Smith against the New York Life Insurance Company to recover upon a policy for $10,000. Defendant appeals. Reversed.
On the 21st day of February, 1891, appellant, the New York Life Insurance Company, insured the life of Albert B. Smith, the husband of appellee, Nannie E. Smith, for $10,000. That policy was No. 393,005. The loss, if any accrued, was, by the terms of said policy, payable to the appellee, Nannie E. Smith. The policy recited the receipt of $472 as premium for the first two years' "term insurance," and of the annual payment of $318, being the life premium to be paid at the office of said company on or before the 9th day of February in every year during the continuance of the policy, commencing on the 9th day of February, 1893. By the terms of the policy, it began on the 9th day of February, 1891, at noon, and appellant promised and agreed to pay the amount of insurance, at its office in the city of New York, to Nannie E. Smith, wife of the insured, or, in the event of her prior death, to insured's executors, administrators, or assigns, upon receipt and approval of proof of death of Albert B. Smith during the continuance of the policy, deducting therefrom all indebtedness due the company, together with any balance of the year's premium remaining unpaid.
The provisions of chapter 347 of the Laws of 1879 of the state of New York were stated to have been waived in the application for the policy. The policy recited that it was accepted upon the following express conditions and agreements: The provisions, requirements, and benefits referred to by the policy were, among others, as follows: It was recited that these benefits were at the option of the insured, but it was further recited that it was understood and agreed "that not less than three months prior to the completion of the distribution period the said insured should notify the company, in writing, which benefit is selected, and that, if such notification shall be received, then and in that case the surplus apportioned in said policy should be applied to the purchase of an annuity, as stipulated in the first benefit named above." It was stipulated that, in the payment of premiums upon the policy falling due within the selected distribution period, a grace should be allowed of one month, provided that, in all cases when this grace is availed of, interest at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum should be paid to the company for the time deferred. It was provided that, if the policy continued in force after the distribution period, surplus would be apportioned to it at the expiration of each period of five years thereafter, such apportionments to be made in the form of reversionary additions; but that the value of the same might, at the option of the insured, be taken in cash, or applied to the reduction of premiums during the next five-year period, or to the permanent reduction of all future premiums; that, when the value is taken in cash, payment should be made to the insured, and his receipt should be a valid release to the company. It was provided that, if the policy was in force, it might be surrendered to the company at the expiration of any period of 5 years after the distribution period, upon 30 days' previous notice, and that, if so surrendered, the entire reserve at American 4 per cent., and, in addition thereto, the surplus then apportioned, would be allowed as the surrender value of the policy. It further provided for the premium loans and mortuary dividends, and stipulated that no agent had power, on behalf of the company, to make or modify the policy, or to extend the time for paying a premium, to waive any forfeiture, to issue a permit for residence, travel, or occupation, or to bind the company by making any promise or receiving any representation or information, and that such power could be exercised only by the president, vice president, or attorney of the company, and that it would not be delegated; that all premiums would be due and payable at the home office of the company (which was New York City), unless otherwise agreed in writing, but might be paid to agents producing receipts signed by the president, vice president, or actuary, and countersigned by such agent; that notice that each and every payment of premium should be due at the date named in the policy was given by the policy, and accepted by the insured, by the delivery and acceptance of the policy, and that any other or further notice required by any statute was thereby expressly waived; that the giving of any further notice, or the acceptance of any premium after it was due, was to be considered as an act of courtesy only, and should not be deemed as waiving or disturbing any of the conditions as to the payment of premiums thereafter due.
Appellant is, and was at the time of the issuance of said policy, a life insurance corporation duly incorporated under the laws of New York, and doing a life insurance business in the state of New York, as well as in the state of Texas. There is, and was at the time of making such insurance contract, a statute of the state of New York, enacted in 1876, and amended in 1877, which is in substance as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Carter
...recovers less than his demand, he is not entitled to the 12 per cent. penalty given by the statute. 49 Ark. 492; 112 Ga. 765; 115 Ga. 113; 41 S.W. 680; 105 F. 165 U.S. 150. OPINION WOOD, J., (after stating the facts.) 1. The appellant did not waive the right to have any disputed questions o......
-
Atchison Co v. Matthews
...of the laws: Jolliffe v. Brown, 14 Wash. 155, 44 Pac. 149; Randolph v. Supply Co., 106 Ala. 501, 17 South. 721; Insurance Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S. W. 680; Railway Co. v. Williams, 49 Ark. 492, 5 S. W. 883; Railway Co. v. Outcalt, 2 Colo. App. 395, 31 Pac. 177; Railroad Co. v. Bat......
-
Robnett v. Cotton States Life Insurance Co.
...104 U.S. 303; 144 Id. 430-51. Part payment (as here), accepted by the company after maturity, waives a forfeiture. 25 Cyc. 870, note b.; 41 S.W. 680. there is a conflict between the policy and the note, the policy governs. 4 Mo. 386; 36 Okla. 733; 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 376. After a company ha......
-
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Orlopp
...change the policies so as to constitute them contracts for term insurance, and hence not subject to the statute. See Insurance Co. v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 41 S. W. 680, and authorities there cited; Insurance Co. v. Statham, 93 U. S. 24, 23 L. Ed. 789. We come, then, to consider the terms ......