New York University v. Whalen
| Decision Date | 06 December 1978 |
| Citation | 386 N.E.2d 245,413 N.Y.S.2d 637,46 N.Y.2d 734 |
| Parties | , 386 N.E.2d 245 In the Matter of NEW YORK UNIVERSITY et al., Appellants, v. Robert P. WHALEN, as Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
It is the policy of this State as expressed in its "Open Meetings Law" (Public Officers Law, §§ 95-106) that "public business be performed in an open and public manner and that the citizens of this state be fully aware of and able to observe the performance of public officials and attend and listen to the deliberations and decisions that go into the making of public policy." ( § 95.) In furtherance of this objective of public accountability, courts are em powered, In their discretion and upon good cause shown, to declare void any action taken by a public body in violation of the mandate of this legislation. ( § 102.) Inclusion by the Legislature of this language vesting in the courts the discretion to grant remedial relief makes it abundantly clear that not every breach of the "Open Meetings Law" automatically triggers its enforcement sanctions. (See, generally, Comment, New York Open Meetings Law: A Critical Evaluation, 41 Albany L.Rev. 329, 353-354.)
Judicial relief is warranted only upon a showing of good cause. ( § 102, subd. 1.) Since appellants have failed to meet this burden, their petition was properly dismissed.
Order affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of Sardinia
...to declare void any action taken by a public body in violation of the mandate of this legislation" (Matter of New York Univ. v. Whalen, 46 N.Y.2d 734, 735, 413 N.Y.S.2d 637, 386 N.E.2d 245 [emphasis in original] and will scrutinize the propriety of executive sessions, "lest the * * * mandat......
-
Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse Indus. Development Agency
...to declare void any action taken by a public body in violation of the mandate of this legislation" (Matter of New York Univ. v. Whalen, 46 N.Y.2d 734, 735, 413 N.Y.S.2d 637, 386 N.E.2d 245 [emphasis omitted], it is the challenger's burden to show good cause warranting judicial relief (see, ......
-
Clover/Allen's Creek Neighborhood Ass'n v. M & F, LLC
... ... Enterprises, Inc., Collectively d/b/a AS Daniele Family Companies, Town of Brighton, New York, Town Board of the Town of Brighton, New York, NMS Allens Creek, Inc., Rochester Gas and Electric ... N.Y.3d 906. The challenger carries the good cause burden ... See New York Univ. v. Whalen , 46 N.Y.2d 734, 735 ... (1978). "'Good cause' factors include ... 'insufficient notice, ... ...
-
McCrory v. Vill. of Mamaroneck Bd. of Trs.
...; see Matter of Perez v. City Univ. of N.Y., 5 N.Y.3d 522, 528, 806 N.Y.S.2d 460, 840 N.E.2d 572 ; Matter of New York Univ. v. Whalen, 46 N.Y.2d 734, 735, 413 N.Y.S.2d 637, 386 N.E.2d 245 ; Chestnut Ridge Assoc., LLC v. 30 Sephar Lane, Inc., 169 A.D.3d 995, 998, 94 N.Y.S.3d 596 ; Matter of ......