Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co.
| Decision Date | 21 July 1950 |
| Citation | 47 So.2d 527 |
| Parties | NEWBY v. WEST PALM BEACH WATER CO. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
L. H. Brannon, Delray Beach, and Robert E. Hathaway, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Scott M. Loftin, Robert H. Anderson, William S. Frates and Loftin, Anderson, Scott, McCarthy & Preston, Miami, for appellee.
Appellee, West Palm Beach Water Company, owned, operated and controlled a plant for treating, strong and distributing water to the City of West Palm Beach. One feature of this plant was a reservoir 120 feet long, 50 feet wide and 14 feet deep when filled with water. The reservoir was within the corporate limits of the city. It was not fenced and was on lands owned by defendant. It was surrounded by grass lands or lawns and as one approached it the land rose about seven feet above the general ground level. At the top of the eleva the reservoir was surrounded by a concrete curbing about eight inches high and ten inches wide. On the inside it slanted gradually to the bottom. A part of the equipment of the reservoir was a series of pipes which sprayed water into the air reflecting light rays in rainbow colors. The reservoir was located about 75 feet from the highway adjacent to a thickly populated area of the City of West Palm Beach.
August 3, 1947, a child of appellant, eight years and ten months old, approached the reservoir and while playing near it, fell into the water and was drowned. This action was brought by the appellant father to recover damages for the negligent death of his minor child. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained, final judgment was entered for the defendant and the plaintiff appealed.
The court below sustained the demurrer to the declaration and entered final judgment for the defendant on the theory that the plaintiff's declaration failed to state a cause of action under the rule announced by this Court in Allen v. Williams P. McDonald Corporation, 42 So.2d 706. In that case we were concerned with an artificial pond, constructed in a thickly populated area of Polk County, adjacent to which the owner left spoil banks of white sand that attracted children of tender years, one of whom, a child two and one-half years of age, slid down the spoil bank into the water and was drowned. We applied the attractive nuisance doctrine to this state of facts and reversed the judgment of the trial court holding to the contrary.
In the case at bar we are confronted with an artificial lake or reservoir into which a child almost nine years old fell and was drowned. There were no sand banks adjacent to it. In fact, it had to be approached by a gradual climb of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode
...of danger that does not exist in ponds generally. See Lomas v. West Palm Beach Water Co., 57 So.2d 881 (Fla.1952); Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co., 47 So.2d 527 (Fla.1950); Allen v. William P. McDonald Corp., 42 So.2d 706 (Fla.1949). See also Kinya v. Lifter, Inc., 489 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d ......
-
Saga Bay Property Owners Ass'n v. Askew
...contains a dangerous condition constituting a trap. Allen v. William P. McDonald Corp., 42 So.2d 706 (Fla.1949); Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co., 47 So.2d 527 (Fla.1950); Adler v. Copeland, 105 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); see Carmichael v. Little Rock Housing Authority, 227 Ark. 470, 2......
-
Lockridge v. Standard Oil Co., Ind.
...v. Boyd, supra; Williams v. Kansas City, Clay County & St. Joseph Ry. Co., 1928, 222 Mo.App. 865, 6 S.W.2d 48; Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co., Fla., 1950, 47 So.2d 527. The appellant's argument is to the effect that because of the difference in ages of the deceased in this case and the ......
-
McGill v. City of Laurel
...but to have been the proximate cause of the child's death, by causing him to fall. The Supreme Court of Florida in Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co., 47 So.2d 527 (Fla.1950), distinguished the Allen case by saying the reasoning in the Allen case was based upon the fact that a two and a hal......