Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Investors, Inc.

• Decision Date: 18 June 1991
• Docket Number: No. 90-1521,90-1521
• Citation: 580 So.2d 894
• Parties: NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., Chrysler Capital Realty, Inc., and Newport Operating Corporation, Appellees. 580 So.2d 894, 16 Fla. L. Week. D1619
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

Page 894

580 So.2d 894

NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., Chrysler Capital Realty, Inc., and Newport Operating Corporation, Appellees.

No. 90-1521.

580 So.2d 894, 16 Fla. L. Week. D1619

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 18, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Murray Goldman, Judge.

Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider and Maurice M. Garcia, Hollywood, for appellant.

Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin and Steven I. Peretz; Coll, Davidson, Carter, Smith, Salter & Barkett and Vance E. Salter

and Michael J. Higer, Miami, for appellees.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So.2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat'l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So.2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So.2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law and summary final judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.

Affirmed.