Nichols v. State

Citation344 S.W.2d 694,171 Tex.Crim. 42
Decision Date29 March 1961
Docket NumberNo. 33230,33230
PartiesClaud NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

[171 TEXCRIM 42] Clyde Elliott, Jr., Canton, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.

The complaint appearing in the transcript is not sworn to before any official or person in authority and is therefore insufficient to constitute the basis for a valid information. Purcell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 317 S.W.2d 208.

The punishment assessed is less than the minimum, and the [171 TEXCRIM 43] judgment cannot stand. Malone v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 328 S.W.2d 310.

For the reasons set forth, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

[171 TEXCRIM 42] WOODLEY, P. J., absent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1991
    ...sworn to before any official or person in authority is insufficient to constitute a basis for a valid conviction. Nichols v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 42, 344 S.W.2d 694 (1961) (citing Purcell v. State, 317 S.W.2d 208 (Tex.Cr.App.1958)); see also Eldridge v. State, 572 S.W.2d 716, 717, n. 1 (Tex......
  • Ho v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1993
    ...to before some official or person in authority is insufficient to constitute a basis for a valid conviction. Nichols v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 42, 344 S.W.2d 694, 694 (App.1961); Price, 816 S.W.2d at However, when an original complaint and information are proper, the trial court has jurisdict......
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 26, 1984
    ...Russell v. State, 352 S.W.2d 746 (Tex.Cr.App.1962); Craven v. State, 350 S.W.2d 34 (Tex.Cr.App.1961); Nichols v. State, 344 S.W.2d 694 (Tex.Cr.App.1961); Bradshaw v. State, 331 S.W.2d 52 As we previously pointed out, after appellant was convicted of committing the offense of burglary of a h......
  • Grant v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 25, 1969
    ...379 S.W.2d 333; Russell v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 626, 352 S.W.2d 746; Craven v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 350 S.W.2d 34; Nichols v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 42, 344 S.W.2d 694; Gilliland v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 342 S.W.2d 327; Justice v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 383, 341 S.W.2d 431; and see cases collated ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT