Nicholson v. Fields

Decision Date29 May 1916
Docket Number17869
Citation71 So. 900,111 Miss. 638
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesNICHOLSON ET AL. v. FIELDS ET AL

APPEAL from the chancery court of Kemper county, HON. J. F. MCCOOL Chancellor.

Bill of complaint by C. S. Field and others against T. H. Nicholson and others. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

Section 2765 of the Code of 1906, referred to in the opinion, is as follows:

Estates in fee tail are prohibited; and every estate which, but for this statute, would be an estate in fee tail, shall be an estate in fee simple; but any person may make a conveyance or a devise of lands to a succession of donees then living, not exceeding two, and to the heirs of the body of the remainderman, and, in default thereof, to the . . . heirs of the donor, in fee simple.

Affirmed.

OPINION

COOK, P. J.

Appellees exhibited their bill of complaint in the chancery court of Kemper county for the purpose of having the court to construe the last will and testament of James Milton Nicholson, Sr. deceased, and to have the court remove the cloud on complainant's title to certain described lands. A demurrer to the bill was filed by appellants, which demurrer was overruled, and appellants filed their answer making same a cross-bill. On a final hearing the following decree was entered in the cause, viz:

"This day came on to be heard before James F. McCool, chancellor of the sixth chancery district of said state, in vacation, at Kosciusko, Miss., the above-entitled cause under an order made at the December term, 1913, of said chancery court sitting at De Kalb, Miss., taking the said cause under advisement, decree to be rendered in vacation; and, the said cause having been submitted on bill of complaint, exhibits thereto, answer and cross-bill of defendant, answer of complainants, cross-bill, and written agreement, and also on brief of counsel, and the chancellor having considered the same and being satisfied that complainants are entitled to the relief prayed for in their bill of complaint, doth order and decree that the allegations of the said bill of complaint be and they are hereby sustained, and that complainants are hereby declared to be the owners in fee simple of the lands in controversy, and the clouds to the complainants' title, as asserted by the said defendants, be and are hereby removed. The said lands being described as follows, to wit [describing the land].

"And the chancellor, being called on by the pleading in this cause to construe the will of James Milton Nicholson, deceased, a copy of which said will is attached as an exhibit to the bill of complaint, which is the main question involved herein holds and does decree that the said testator, James Milton Nicholson, deceased, in attempting to control the alienation of the lands mentioned in said last will and testament, both the lands devised to his nephews Joseph Allen Nicholson, James Lauren Nicholson, and John Quitman Nicholson, and also the lands devised to his grandsons, the defendants in this cause, beyond the period of time and number of donees not permitted by law, violated the rule against perpetuities under the laws of the state of Mississippi, and the chancellor holds and decrees that the lands devised to his said nephews, they being the first takers thereunder, which said lands are described in said last will and testament, a part of which as above described being in controversy in this suit, became the property in fee simple of said nephews, and that complainants, by virtue of this conveyance executed to them by said nephews, to wit, Joseph Allen Nicholson, James Lauren Nicholson, and John Quitman Nicholson, which conveyance is recorded in Deed Book Y, at page 6 of the records of deeds of Kemper county, are now vested with the fee-simple title to said lands.

"And the chancellor, being also requested to construe the whole will, further holds and decrees that the said James Milton Nicholson, deceased, in attempting to control the alienation of the lands mentioned in said will beyond...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Carter v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 22 Abril 1957
    ...limitation over upon the death of each without issue to the survivor or survivors being a valid executory devise. In Nicholson v. Fields, 111 Miss. 638, 71 So. 900, 901, where the testator undertook to entail his land by his will, the Court held that 'It is impossible to separate the severa......
  • Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Newsom
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 24 Febrero 1936
    ...289; Smith v. Muse, 134 Miss. 827, 98 So. 436; Caldwell v Willis, 57 Miss. 574; Ward v. Cooper, 13 So. 827, 69 Miss 789; Nicholson v. Fields, 71 So. 900, 111 Miss. 638; Cranberry v. Swayze, 140 Miss. 726, 106 So. The devise to Nathan W. Newsom, being a conditional devise to him in fee subje......
  • In Re: On Suggestion Of Error
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 24 Febrero 1936
    ... ... 289; Smith v. Muse, 134 Miss. 827, 98 So ... 436; Caldwell v. Willis, 57 Miss. 574; Ward v. Cooper, 13 So ... 827, 69 Miss. 789; Nicholson v. Fields, 71 So. 900, 111 Miss ... 638; Granberry v. Swayze, 140 Miss. 726, 106 So. 442. [175 ... Miss. 123] ... The ... devise to ... ...
  • Gordon v. Gordon
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 28 Octubre 1940
    ...Norfleet, 151 Miss. 790; Liberty Bank v. Wilson, 116 Miss. 377; Smith v. Muse, 134 Miss. 827; Caldwell v. Willis, 57 Miss. 555; Nicholson v. Fields, 111 Miss. 638; v. Grissom, 178 Miss. 108. The will in question confers a vested remainder in the "brother and sister, " under whom appellee cl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT