Nicholson v. State
| Decision Date | 30 January 1979 |
| Docket Number | 1 Div. 1 |
| Citation | 366 So.2d 1142 |
| Parties | Elijah NICHOLSON, alias Monkey Man v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
No briefs for appellant.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Edwin L. Yates, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.
The grand jury of Mobile County returned an indictment against the appellant, Elijah Nicholson, charging him with burglary second degree. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty. A jury found the appellant guilty of burglary in the second degree. The trial court duly sentenced the appellant to eight years imprisonment in the penitentiary, and the appellant appeals to this Court.
The appellant was at all proceedings in the trial court represented by court appointed counsel, and is so represented in this Court. This appeal was submitted to this Court on brief of appellee and on letter of no merits of appellant.
At the conclusion of State's evidence, the appellant made a motion to exclude State's evidence on the grounds that the indictment stated it was the store building of St. Stephens Drugs, Incorporated, a corporation that was broken and entered, and the proof is that the drug store is a corporation that does not own the store building.
State's witness, Mr. Clifford Smith, testified in substance the following: That St. Stephens Drugs, Incorporated, a corporation, was a legally formed corporation; that he is the president of the company; that there were several other businesses in the building but they were all partitioned off; that none of the other businesses in the building had access to the room that was broken into; that Mr. Lewis Smith owned the building and that St. Stephens Drugs, Incorporated, a corporation, had no interest in the building besides just renting that part it occupied; that the drug store was the only occupant of the part of the store building broken into; that all entrances into the drug store and storage room were securely locked; that the door of the store room was broken into.
State further presented other evidence that fully sustains the jury's verdict finding the appellant guilty of burglary in the second degree.
We hold that the motion of appellant to exclude State's evidence on the grounds that St. Stephens Drugs, Incorporated, a corporation, was not the owner of the building broken into is not well taken. Burglary is an offense against possession or occupancy of a building, and the test for determining ownership of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tate v. State
...title to the property broken and entered, but its occupancy or possession at the time the offense was committed.’ Nicholson v. State, 366 So. 2d 1142 (Ala. Crim. App. 1979)." Gaines, 460 So. 2d at 241.The Gaines Court concluded, with regard to the alleged variance:"The indictment sufficient......
-
Gaines v. State, 1 Div. 736
...not title to the property broken and entered, but its occupancy or possession at the time the offense was committed." Nicholson v. State, 366 So.2d 1142 (Ala.Crim.App.1979); see also, Adams v. State, supra. Where, as in the instant case, the proof shows that the building burglarized was occ......