Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 87-2434
| Decision Date | 10 August 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-2434,87-2434 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1926 E. Joan NICKOLAUSON, individually and as representative of the Estate of Joseph Paul Bolvin, deceased, Appellant, v. Jimmie Harris RHYNE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Charles J. Cheves of Cheves & Rapkin, Venice, for appellant.
Douglas P. Lawless of Taylor and Lawless, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee.
Appellant, E. Joan Nickolauson, individually and as personal representative, sued appellee, Jimmie Harris Rhyne, for legal malpractice. The trial court dismissed her complaint with prejudice and she filed this appeal. We reverse.
In her complaint Nickolauson alleged that she employed the Pratt law firm in Manatee County to probate the will of the late Joseph Paul Bolvin and to serve as attorneys for the decedent's estate. She alleged that thereafter she dealt exclusively with Rhyne, an attorney acting on behalf of the Pratt firm and that he negligently performed legal services. She claimed to have suffered certain losses as a direct and proximate result of Rhyne's negligence and sought damages in excess of $5,000.
Rhyne filed a motion to dismiss which the trial court granted with leave to amend. When Nickolauson declined to amend, the trial court dismissed her complaint with prejudice stating:
1. The complaint failed to allege any agreement, contract or arrangement between the attorney Rhyne and the plaintiff.
2. The complaint failed to allege the breach of any duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, the breach of which caused or contributed to the plaintiff's damages.
It is basic that a complaint setting forth a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, the ultimate facts showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment is sufficient under Rule 1.110(b) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. To plead a cause of action for legal malpractice the plaintiff must allege three elements: (1) the attorney's employment and (2) his neglect of a reasonable duty, which (3) is the proximate cause of loss to his client. Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So.2d 1083, 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
We think Nickolauson's complaint sufficiently states a cause of action. In seeking to sustain the trial court's ruling, Rhyne points out that the complaint lacks a direct and positive allegation that Nickolauson employed Rhyne rather than the Pratt law firm. Rhyne suggests that to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. Philip L. Burnett, P.A.
...duty that has been the proximate cause of loss to his client. Thompson v. Martin, 530 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Nicholauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). The complaint alleged that the appellant had employed Philip L. Burnett, P.A., and Philip Burnett, the appellees, in a ......
-
Vergara v. Butter, 90-1029
...record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat.......
-
Negligence cases
...232 So.3d 487, 491 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). 4. Cira v. Dillinger , 903 So.2d 367, 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). 5. Nickolauson v. Rhyne , 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). 6. Stake v. Harlan , 529 So.2d 1183, 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (See concurring opinion). 7. Thompson v. Martin , 530 So.2d 495, 496 ......
-
1-3 First Predicate: Attorney's Employment
...2d 192 (Fla. 1987).[63] Angel, Cohen and Rogovin v. Oberon Inv, N.V., 512 So. 2d 192, 194 (Fla. 1987). See also Nick-olauson v. Rhyne, 529 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1988) (alleging privity sufficiently with the details to be determined from the evidence); Voutsinas v. Stutin, 626 S......
-
Probate
...is engaged by the personal representative to assist with the administration of the estate owes a duty of care. [ Nickolauson v. Rhyne , 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (acknowledging the personal representative’s standing personal representative to sue estate attorney for legal malpractice......