Nieves v. State, 98-3026.
| Decision Date | 24 February 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 98-3026.,98-3026. |
| Citation | 779 So.2d 294 |
| Parties | Benjamin NIEVES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Benjamin Nieves, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Erin E. Dardis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.
On a Rule 3.850 motion, Benjamin Nieves challenges the validity of his sentence, pursuant to a guilty plea, on a charge of lewd assault. We agree with Nieves that the length of the sentence was improperly calculated. Therefore, we vacate the sentence and remand to the trial court, for the reasons stated below.
On September 12, 1997, Nieves was sentenced, pursuant to a guilty plea, to thirty months in prison, followed by five years probation, on a lewd assault charge. At the time of this sentencing, Nieves was already in prison serving a thirty-month sentence for a similar crime on the same victim in Monroe County. The trial judge orally pronounced that: (1) Nieves would receive credit for time served in the Monroe case, from July 16, 1996, until the date of sentencing, September 12, 1997; and (2) the current sentence would be concurrent and coterminous with the Monroe sentence.1 As it turned out, neither of these pronouncements was followed, resulting in the instant appeal.
On the credit for time served issue, the oral pronouncement of the judge was not reflected on Nieves's sentencing document. Rather than showing credit for the period from July 16, 1996, through September 12, 1997-a period of fourteen months-the sentencing document only credited Nieves with eight days. The State concedes error. A defendant's sentence must conform to the oral pronouncement of the sentence. See Amador v. State, 713 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see also Stevens v. State, 651 So.2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Timmons v. State, 453 So.2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Upon remand, we direct the trial court to award full credit for time served. In this instance, the correction of credit for time served would effectively reduce Nieves's sentence from thirty months to sixteen months, which would have moved Nieves's release date up to January 1999. Thus, it appears to us that Nieves's immediate release from prison is warranted, and we direct the trial court to resolve this matter as expeditiously as possible.
Regarding the instant sentence being coterminous with the Monroe County sentence, Nieves's position is also well taken. Although the judge pronounced that the Dade sentence would be concurrent and coterminous with the Monroe sentence, and the sentencing document reflects this, section 944.275(4)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1997), prevents this limitation of the Dade sentence,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Moore v. Pearson
...conflicts with the decisions of other district courts in Turner v. State, 689 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), and Nieves v. State, 779 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), on the same question of This Court accepted jurisdiction and granted DOC's motion to stay the mandate of the district court's d......