Nimely v. Corneh
Citation | 214 A.D.3d 812,185 N.Y.S.3d 255 |
Docket Number | 2022-00065, 2022-00066, 2022-00067,Docket No. F-32050-11/19F |
Decision Date | 15 March 2023 |
Parties | In the Matter of Douglas NIMELY, appellant, v. Messie CORNEH, respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
214 A.D.3d 812
185 N.Y.S.3d 255
In the Matter of Douglas NIMELY, appellant,
v.
Messie CORNEH, respondent.
2022-00065, 2022-00066, 2022-00067
Docket No. F-32050-11/19F
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Submitted—February 14, 2023
March 15, 2023
Douglas Nimely, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of dismissal of the Family Court, Kings County (Adele Alexis Harris, S.M.), dated October 29, 2021, (2) an order of the same court, also dated October 29, 2021, and (3) an order of the same court (Diane Costanzo, J.) dated December 13, 2021. The order of dismissal, after a hearing, dismissed the father's petition for downward modification of his child support obligation, vacated a temporary order of support dated January 9, 2020, nunc pro tunc, and reinstated the child support provisions of a prior order of the same court (Adele Alexis Harris, S.M.) dated September 4, 2018. The order dated October 29, 2021, insofar as appealed from, after the
hearing, in effect, reinstated the child support provisions of the order dated September 4, 2018. The order dated December 13, 2021, denied the father's objections, in effect, to the order of dismissal and the order dated October 29, 2021.
ORDERED that the appeals from the order of dismissal and the order dated October 29, 2021, are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as those orders were superseded by the order dated December 13, 2021; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated December 13, 2021, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The parties have two children together. Pursuant to an order dated September 4, 2018, the father's child support obligation
To continue reading
Request your trial