NLRB v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, 73-3365.
| Decision Date | 07 August 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73-3365.,73-3365. |
| Citation | 499 F.2d 129 |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SEQUOIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, etc., Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C. and Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20 NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Victor J. Van Bourg, Michael B. Roger, of Levy, Van Bourg & Hackler, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Before KOELSCH, WRIGHT and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") for enforcement of its order against Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO ("the Union"). The Board's decision and order are reported at 206 N.L. R.B. No. 8 (1973).
Based on our review of the record as a whole, the Board's finding that the Union engaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4)), is supported by substantial evidence.
The Board may properly enter a broad order such as this one here if a Union has demonstrated a "proclivity" to violate the secondary boycott provisions of the Act. N. L. R. B. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70, 490 F.2d 87, 88 (9th Cir. 1973); N. L. R. B. v. Local 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 454 F.2d 875, 879 (9th Cir. 1972). The record shows that this respondent has a history of similar violations, including one fully litigated decision (186 N. L. R. B. 432 (1970), enforced by this court in an unreported decision filed January 10, 1972), and settlement stipulations in two separate cases (Nos. 20-CC-1143, 1273). The prior settlement stipulations may be treated as equivalent to fully adjudicated decisions of the Board enforced by this court, in accordance with the terms of the stipulations.
The Board's order will be enforced.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
N.L.R.B. v. Sequoia Dist. Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO
...proceeding we enforced a Board order prohibiting Sequoia from engaging in illegal secondary activities. 4 NLRB v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, 499 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1974). That judgment ordered that 1. Cease and desist from: (a) Picketing or encouragement of any individual emplo......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Selvin
...evidence of a proclivity to violate the Act, the Board may properly enter broad remedial orders. See NLRB v. Segnoia Dist. Council of Carpenters, 499 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1974); NLRB v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70, 490 F.2d 87, 88 (9th Cir. 1973); NLRB v. Local 85, International Br......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Union Local No. 1622, United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, AFL-CI
...orders which are not limited to the parties or the dispute involved in the particular case. NLRB v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, 499 F.2d 129, 129 (9th Cir.1974) (per curiam). The Sec. 8(b)(4)(i) and (ii)(B) violations by Local 1622 against Specialty and Wood, coupled with violat......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Bd., United Broth. of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, AFL-CIO
...instances of repeated violations. See NLRB v. Carpenters Local 1622, 121 LRRM 3539, 3541 (9th Cir.1986); NLRB v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, 499 F.2d 129 (9th Cir.1974); NLRB v. Teamsters Local 70, 490 F.2d 87, 88 (9th Cir.1973). But a broad order does not invariably follow from......