Noakes v. Rosa, 2008-00940
| Decision Date | 05 August 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 2008-00940,2008-00940 |
| Citation | 2008 NY Slip Op 6550,54 A.D.3d 317,862 N.Y.S.2d 573 |
| Parties | KENNETH NOAKES, Respondent, v. JOHANNA ROSA, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff in an automobile accident. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant's car rear-ended his car. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff's car backed into her car. At the trial on the issue of liability the court admitted into evidence, over the defendant's objection, a police accident report. The report contained two opposing hearsay statements regarding how this accident allegedly occurred. It also contained a statement allegedly made by the defendant that she was upset because she had received bad news. The subscribing police officer was not an eyewitness and did not testify at trial.
The police report should not have been admitted into evidence as a business record exception to the hearsay rule (see Johnson v Lutz, 253 NY 124 [1930]). The statement in the report that the defendant "rear-ended" the plaintiff was from an unknown source. Since the source of this statement was not identifiable, it was error to admit it (see Battista v Rizzi, 228 AD2d 533 [1996]). It could not be established whether the source had a duty to make the statement or whether some other hearsay exception applied (see Murray v Donlan, 77 AD2d 337 [1980]).
It was also error to admit the statement in the report allegedly made by the defendant that the plaintiff's car backed into her car. This was a self-serving statement that did not fall within a hearsay exception (see Casey v Tierno, 127 AD2d 727 [1987]).
Since these statements bore on the ultimate issue of fact to be decided by the jury, their admission constituted prejudicial and reversible error, and a new trial is warranted (see Hatton v Gassler, 219 AD2d 697 [1995]; Gagliano v Vaccaro, 97 AD2d 430 [1983]).
Before: SPOLZINO, J.P., SANTUCCI, ENG and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Ins. Co.
...issue to be determined by the jury ( see Cheul Soo Kang v. Violante, 60 A.D.3d at 992, 877 N.Y.S.2d 354 [2009]; Noakes v. Rosa, 54 A.D.3d 317, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573 [2008]; Hatton v. Gassler, 219 A.D.2d 697, 631 N.Y.S.2d 757 [1995]; Gagliano v. Vaccaro, 97 A.D.2d 430, 467 N.Y.S.2d 396 [1983]; Mu......
-
Marrero v. Carolan
... ... fact to be decided by the jury]; Noakes v. Rosa, 54 ... A.D.3d 317, 318, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573; Casey v. Tierno, ... 127 A.D.2d ... ...
-
Adobea v. Junel
...v. Tepan, 92 A.D.3d 721, 722, 938 N.Y.S.2d 475;Cheul Soo Kang v. Violante, 60 A.D.3d 991, 991, 877 N.Y.S.2d 354;Noakes v. Rosa, 54 A.D.3d 317, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573). Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the party admission exception to the hearsay rule did not apply because the statement fro......
-
Torres v. Mejia
... ... fact to be decided by the jury]; Noakes v. Rosa, 54 ... A.D.3d 317, 318, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573; Casey v. Tierno, ... 127 A.D.2d ... ...
-
Hearsay
...state whether EMT personally saw the condition, or was restating what plaintiff told him after the accident occurred. Noakes v. Rosa , 54 A.D.3d 317, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dept 2008). Statement contained in police report made by unidentified witness, as well as self-serving statement by defe......
-
Table of cases
...408, 902 N.Y.S.2d 65(1st Dept 2010), § 6:60 Nissen v. Rubin, 121 A.D.2d 320, 504 N.Y.S.2d 106 (1st Dept. 1986), § 1:220 Noakes v. Rosa, 54 A.D.3d 317, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dept 2008), § 5:160 Noce v. Kaufman, 2 N.Y.2d 347, 161 N.Y.S.2d 1 (1957), § 19:80 Nomura Asset Capital Corporation v. C......
-
Table of Cases
...Inc. , 630 F.Supp.2d 115 (D.Mass., 2009), §21.300 Noah v. GMC, 882 So.2d 235 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004), §20.500 Noakes v. Rosa , 54 A.D.3d, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2008), §21.401(b) Noble v. Sheahan , 132 F.Supp.2d 626 (N.D. Ill. 2001), §21.413 Noffke v. Perez , 178 P.3d 1141 (Alask......
-
Hearsay
...not state whether EMT personally saw the condition, or was restating what plaintif told him after the accident occurred. Noakes v. Rosa , 54 A.D.3d 317, 862 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dept 2008). Statement contained in police report made by unidentiied witness, as well as self-serving statement by de......