Noel v. Hays

Decision Date24 November 1897
Citation43 S.W. 432
PartiesNOEL v. HAYS et al.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Bell county.

"Not to be officially reported."

Suit by N. B. Hays against H. T. Noel and others to foreclose a vendor's lien. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Noel appeals. Affirmed.

Thomas H. Hines, for appellant.

Weller & Hays and Chapman & Sampson, for appellee.

HAZELRIGG, J.

Appellee, Hays, was the owner of a house and lot in Middlesboro, which he sold and conveyed to McDowell & West, retaining a lien for certain unpaid purchase money. Afterwards the house burned, and by an arrangement between McDowell & West and appellant, Noel, the latter erected a valuable house on the lot, with the understanding that he was to own one-half the property, and McDowell & West the other half. Hays subsequently brought suit for his purchase money, and, learning of Noel's alleged interest, made him a party defendant. The defense was then interposed that Hays had agreed to release his lien on Noel's one-half interest in the property, in consideration that Noel build the house in accordance with his contract with McDowell & West. The only proof offered to this effect is the deposition of West, and this is emphatically denied by Hays. The contention of appellant is very improbable but, if equal credit be given the testimony of Hays and West, the burden being on the appellant, he must fail. The chancellor so decided, and the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Company
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 4 janvier 1915
    ...the part of the company, nor did it give the plaintiff a cause of action. 1 Nellis on Street Railways, 493; 23 Am. Rep. 507; 28 So. 87; 43 S.W. 432; S.W. 707; 36 Cyc. 1561; 6 Thompson, Com. on Negligence, 1374. 2. There is no merit in appellant's objection to instruction 5 given at appellee......
  • Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Dalton
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 24 novembre 1897

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT