Nolte v. Meyer
Decision Date | 27 January 1891 |
Citation | 15 S.W. 276 |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Parties | NOLTE <I>et al.</I> v. MEYER <I>et al.</I> |
Action by plaintiffs to have trustees appointed by the court to administer a trust under an instrument set out in the opinion. The defendants were trustees, elected by the beneficiaries under the instrument in question. Decree was rendered denying the relief asked by plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
Bryan & Campbell, for appellants. J. T. & P. H. Swearengen, for appellees.
This suit was brought by appellants, who claimed to be beneficiaries thereunder, in behalf of themselves and other alleged beneficiaries, to have trustees appointed, and an interpretation of an instrument reading as follows: " ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Haskell v. Ferguson
...person. That provision of the will, therefore, never became operative. Ingraham v. Sutherland, 89 Ark. 596, 117 S. W. 748; Nolte v. Meyer, 79 Tex. 351, 15 S. W. 276; Meyer v. Holle, 83 Tex. 623, 19 S. W. 154; Norcross' Adm'rs v. Murphy's Ex'rs, 44 N. J. Eq. 522, 14 A. 903. The first authori......
-
Clark v. Wisdom, 191
...not in point. The decision in Meyer v. Holle, 83 Tex. 623, 19 S.W. 154, cited by appellants, resulted from the holding in Nolte v. Meyer, 79 Tex. 351, 15 S.W. 276 that the trust deed relied on in the subsequent case was void because of the indefiniteness and uncertainty of the trust attempt......
-
Board of Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church v. May
... ... 156. (6) The bequest to "missionary ... cause" is void because no court can possibly figure out ... what missionary cause was meant. Nolte v. Meyer, 79 ... Tex. 351; Grimes v. Harman, 35 Ind. 198; Moran ... v. Moran, 104 Iowa 216; Schmucker's Estate v ... Reed, 61 Mo. 592. (7) It ... ...
-
Board of Trustees v. May
...St. Rep. 443; Grimes v. Harmon, 35 Ind. 198, 9 Am. Rep. 690; Coleman et al. v. O'Leary's Ex'r, 114 Ky. 388, 70 S. W. 1068; Nolte v. Meyers, 79 Tex. 351, 15 S. W. 276; Pack v. Shanklin et al., 43 W. Va. 304, 27 S. E. 389; McHugh et al. v. McCole et al., 97 Wis. 166, 72 N. W. 631, 40 L. R. A.......