Noonan v. City of Lawrence

Decision Date15 January 1881
Citation130 Mass. 161
PartiesMary Noonan v. City of Lawrence
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Argued November 4, 1880

Essex. Tort for personal injuries occasioned to the plaintiff by a defect in a highway in the defendant city. Writ dated April 18, 1879. Trial in the Superior Court, before Aldrich, J who reported for the consideration of this court the following case:

The plaintiff introduced evidence tending to show that while travelling, in the exercise of due care, on the sidewalk of Oak Street, a public way in the defendant city, in the evening of March 6, 1879, she fell and was hurt; that her fall and consequent injury were caused by a defective and dangerous condition of the way which the defendant had notice of and by reasonable diligence might have remedied, produced by snow and ice which the defendant had negligently permitted to accumulate upon the sidewalk, and to be formed into rough and uneven ridges and slopes by the action of a snow-plough used by the defendant in breaking out paths along the way after snow-falls during the winter, and by the travel of passengers over it. There was evidence of a fall of snow estimated at two inches, on the day of the injury. The plaintiff did not contend, and no evidence was offered tending to show, that there was any fault in the construction of the sidewalk itself, or any defect other than that created by the formation of snow and ice.

On March 18, 1879, the plaintiff caused to be served on the mayor of the defendant city a written notice, signed in her behalf by her attorney, as follows: "This is to notify you that Mary Noonan fell on the sidewalk on the south side of Oak Street, a short distance easterly from Lawrence Street and opposite the premises occupied by Charles Morrison, and belonging as she is informed, though she cannot state positively, to Joseph P. Battles, on Thursday, the 6th day of March, A. D. 1879, at about the hour of six and a half o'clock, P. M., and dislocated her shoulder and suffered a severe shock from the fall. She says that she was travelling on the sidewalk at the time stated, and in the exercise of due care, and that the cause of her fall and consequent injury was the defective and dangerous condition of the way, which the city negligently permitted to be out of repair though bound by law to keep it in repair, and she claims compensation for her said injuries."

The judge ruled that the notice was insufficient to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Larkin v. City of Minneapolis
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1910
    ...in a safe and proper manner the sidewalk crossing is not as definite and certain as is desirable and is sometimes required. Noonan v. City of Lawrence, 130 Mass. 161;Dalton v. City of Salem, 131 Mass. 551;Maloney v. Cook, 21 R. I. 471, 44 Atl. 692;Gagan v. Janesville, 106 Wis. 662, 82 N. W.......
  • Blanchard v. Stone's, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 29, 1939
    ...or her attorney who gave the notice upon one of his letterheads. The notice did not state any specific cause of the accident. Noonan v. Lawrence, 130 Mass. 161;Merrill v. Springfield, 284 Mass. 260, 187 N.E. 551;King v. Boston, Mass., 15 N.E.2d 191;G.L.(Ter.Ed.) c. 84, § 20, as amended by S......
  • Larkin v. City of Minneapolis
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1910
    ...in a safe and proper manner the sidewalk crossing is not as definite and certain as is desirable and is sometimes required. Noonan v. City, 130 Mass. 161; Dalton v. City, 131 Mass. 551; Maloney v. Cook, 21 R. I. 471, 44 Atl. 692; Gagan v. City, 106 Wis. 662, 82 N. W. 558. In each case, howe......
  • Fortin v. Inhabitants of Easthampton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1886
    ...Bailey v. Everett, 132 Mass. 441;Canterbury v. Boston, 141 Mass. 215; S.C. 4 N.E.Rep. 808. See Cronin v. Boston, 135 Mass. 110;Noonan v. Lawrence, 130 Mass. 161;Miles v. Lynn, 130 Mass. 398. The writing is not sufficient under the statute as amended. Harnden v. Gould, 126 Mass. 411;Shea v. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT